Literature DB >> 11516114

Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior.

J R Kraft1, W M Baum.   

Abstract

Group choice refers to the distribution of group members between two choice alternatives over time. The ideal free distribution (IFD), an optimal foraging model from behavioral ecology, predicts that the ratio of foragers at two resource sites should equal the ratio of obtained resources, a prediction that is formally analogous to the matching law of individual choice, except that group choice is a social phenomenon. Two experiments investigated the usefulness of IFD analyses of human group choice and individual-based explanations that might account for the group-level events. Instead of nonhuman animals foraging at two sites for resources, a group of humans chose blue and red cards to receive points that could earn cash prizes. The groups chose blue and red cards in ratios in positive relation to the ratios of points associated with the cards. When group choice ratios and point ratios were plotted on logarithmic coordinates and fitted with regression lines, the slopes (i.e., sensitivity measures) approached 1.0 but tended to fall short of it (i.e., undermatching), with little bias and little unaccounted for variance. These experiments demonstrate that an IFD analysis of group choice is possible and useful, and suggest that group choice may be explained by the individual members' tendency to optimize reinforcement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11516114      PMCID: PMC1285018          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  W Baum; J Kraft
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Increasing and signaling background reinforcement: effect on the foreground response-reinforcer relation.

Authors:  T W Belke; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The ideal free distribution in humans: an experimental test.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; F Tonneau; E Freixa i Baqué
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03
  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  The living legacy of the Harvard Pigeon Lab: quantitative analysis in the wide world.

Authors:  A W Logue
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A half century of scalloping in the work habits of the United States Congress.

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Rebecca Haley; Benjamin Sabo; Jorie Colbert; Georgette Macropoulis
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

3.  Group foraging sensitivity to predictable and unpredictable changes in food distribution: past experience or present circumstances?

Authors:  Kenneth E Bell; William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Benjamin C Ashpole; Michael E Roberts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Human group choice: discrete-trial and free-operant tests of the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Blaine F Peden; Tetsuo Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Benjamin C Ashpole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

7.  Human risky choice under temporal constraints: tests of an energy-budget model.

Authors:  Cynthia J Pietras; Matthew L Locey; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.