Literature DB >> 15948284

Knowledge of resources and competitors in human foraging.

Robert L Goldstone1, Benjamin C Ashpole, Michael E Roberts.   

Abstract

The allocation of human participants to resources was studied by observing the population dynamics of people interacting in real time within a common virtual world. Resources were distributed in two spatially separated pools with varying relative reinforcement rates (50-50, 65-35, or 80-20). We manipulated whether the participants could see each other and the distribution of the resources. When the participants could see each other but not the resources, the richer pool was underutilized. When the participants could see the resources but not each other, the richer pool was overutilized. In conjunction with prior experiments that correlated the visibility of agents and resources (Goldstone & Ashpole, 2004), these results indicate that participants' foraging decisions are influenced by both forager and resource information. The results suggest that the presence of a crowd at a resource is a deterring, rather than an attractive, factor. Both fast and slow oscillations in the harvesting rates of the pools across time were revealed by Fourier analyses. The slow waves of crowd migration were most prevalent when the resources were invisible, whereas the fast cycles were most prevalent when the resources were visible and the participants were invisible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15948284     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  8 in total

1.  Group choice: competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  W Baum; J Kraft
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sources and sinks in population biology.

Authors:  P C Dias
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Group choice: the ideal free distribution of human social behavior.

Authors:  J R Kraft; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Habitat selection rules in breeding mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): a test of two competing hypotheses.

Authors:  Hannu Pöysä; Johan Elmberg; Kjell Sjöberg; Petri Nummi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Human group choice: discrete-trial and free-operant tests of the ideal free distribution.

Authors:  Gregory J Madden; Blaine F Peden; Tetsuo Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Human foraging behavior in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Robert L Goldstone; Benjamin C Ashpole
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

8.  The ideal free distribution in humans: an experimental test.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski; F Tonneau; E Freixa i Baqué
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Regulatory fit effects in a choice task.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

2.  Web-based experiments for the study of collective social dynamics in cultural markets.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-06-11

3.  Insights about the common generative rule underlying an information foraging task can be facilitated via collective search.

Authors:  Aoi Naito; Kentaro Katahira; Tatsuya Kameda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.