Literature DB >> 10550485

Beyond discounting: possible experimental models of impulse control.

J Monterosso1, G Ainslie.   

Abstract

Animal studies of impulsivity have typically used one of three models: a delay of reward procedure, a differential reinforcement for low rate responding (DRL) procedure, or an autoshaping procedure. In each of these paradigms, we argue, measurement of impulsivity is implicitly or explicitly equated with the effect delay has on the value of reward. The steepness by which delay diminishes value (the temporal discount function) is treated as an index of impulsivity. In order to provide a better analog of human impulsivity, this model needs to be expanded to include the converse of impulsivity - self-control. Through mechanisms such as committing to long range interests before the onset of temptation, or through bundling individual choices into classes of choices that are made at once, human decision-making can often look far less myopic than single trial experiments predict. For people, impulsive behavior may be more often the result of the breakdown of self-control mechanisms than of steep discount functions. Existing animal models of self-control are discussed, and future directions are suggested for psychopharmacological research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10550485     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  84 in total

1.  Building blocks of self-control: increased tolerance for delay with bundled rewards.

Authors:  George Ainslie; John R Monterosso
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Negative correlation between right prefrontal activity during response inhibition and impulsiveness: a fMRI study.

Authors:  Shuji Asahi; Yasumasa Okamoto; Go Okada; Shigeto Yamawaki; Norio Yokota
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Interneuronal frontohippocampal interactions in cats trained to choose on the basis of reinforcement quality.

Authors:  G Kh Merzhanova; E E Dolbakyan; V N Khokhlova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-07

4.  Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: a longitudinal twin study.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin; Simon Golosheykin; Julia D Grant; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Analysis of hand kinematics reveals inter-individual differences in intertemporal decision dynamics.

Authors:  Cinzia Calluso; Giorgia Committeri; Giovanni Pezzulo; Nathan Lepora; Annalisa Tosoni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of clomipramine on self-control choice in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Karen G Anderson; William L Woolverton
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Negative automaintenance omission training is effective.

Authors:  Federico Sanabria; Matthew T Sitomer; Peter R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The behavioral economics of will in recovery from addiction.

Authors:  John Monterosso; George Ainslie
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Interactions between the prefrontal cortex and amygdala during delay discounting and reversal.

Authors:  John C Churchwell; Andrea M Morris; Nila M Heurtelou; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Timing and space usage are disrupted by amphetamine in rats maintained on DRL 24-s and DRL 72-s schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Stephen C Fowler; Jonathan Pinkston; Elena Vorontsova
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.