Literature DB >> 23144508

Suppressive and facilitative effects of shock intensity and interresponse times followed by shock.

Jessica B Everly1, Michael Perone.   

Abstract

Although response-dependent shock often suppresses responding, response facilitation can occur. In two experiments, we examined the suppressive and facilitative effects of shock by manipulating shock intensity and the interresponse times that produced shock. Rats' lever presses were reinforced on a variable-interval 40-s schedule of food presentation. Shock followed either long or short interresponse times. Shock intensity was raised from 0.05 mA to 0.4 mA or 0.8 mA. Overall, shock contingent on long interresponse times punished long interresponse times and increased response rates. Shock contingent on short interresponse times punished short interresponse times and decreased response rates. In Experiment 1, raising the range of interresponse times that produced shock enhanced these effects. In Experiment 2, the effects of shock intensity depended on the interresponse times that produced shock. When long interresponse times produced shock, low intensities increased response rates. High intensities decreased response rates. When short interresponse times produced shock, high shock intensities punished short interresponse times and decreased response rates more than low intensities. The results may explain why punishment procedures occasionally facilitate responding and establish parameters for future studies of punishment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electric shock; interresponse times; lever press; punishment; rats; shock intensity

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23144508      PMCID: PMC3494317          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2012.98-311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  39 in total

1.  Punishment in the squirrel monkey Saimiri sciurea.

Authors:  J B APPEL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  EFFECT OF INTENSITY AND DURATION OF PUNISHMENT ON EXTINCTION OF AN AVOIDANCE RESPONSE.

Authors:  M E SEILGMAN; B A CAMPBELL
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-04

3.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Fixed-ratio punishment.

Authors:  N H AZRIN; W C HOLZ; D F HAKE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of punishment intensity during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-04       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

8.  The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: the relative frequency of an interresponse time equals its relative harmonic length.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A role for negative reinforcement of response omission in punishment?

Authors:  J L Arbuckle; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate-schedule performance and nicotine administration: a systematic investigation of dose, dose-regimen, and schedule requirement.

Authors:  Ari P Kirshenbaum; Seth J Brown; David M Hughes; Adam H Doughty
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.