Literature DB >> 10194620

"Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI.

D A Hall1, M P Haggard, M A Akeroyd, A R Palmer, A Q Summerfield, M R Elliott, E M Gurney, R W Bowtell.   

Abstract

The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore central auditory function may be compromised by the intense bursts of stray acoustic noise produced by the scanner whenever the magnetic resonance signal is read out. We present results evaluating the use of one method to reduce the effect of the scanner noise: "sparse" temporal sampling. Using this technique, single volumes of brain images are acquired at the end of stimulus and baseline conditions. To optimize detection of the activation, images are taken near to the maxima and minima of the hemodynamic response during the experimental cycle. Thus, the effective auditory stimulus for the activation is not masked by the scanner noise. In experiment 1, the course of the hemodynamic response to auditory stimulation was mapped during continuous task performance. The mean peak of the response was at 10.5 sec after stimulus onset, with little further change until stimulus offset. In experiment 2, sparse imaging was used to acquire activation images. Despite the fewer samples with sparse imaging, this method successfully delimited broadly the same regions of activation as conventional continuous imaging. However, the mean percentage MR signal change within the region of interest was greater using sparse imaging. Auditory experiments that use continuous imaging methods may measure activation that is a result of an interaction between the stimulus and task factors (e.g., attentive effort) induced by the intense background noise. We suggest that sparse imaging is advantageous in auditory experiments as it ensures that the obtained activation depends on the stimulus alone.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10194620      PMCID: PMC6873323          DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:3<213::aid-hbm5>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  23 in total

1.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Physiology and topography of neurons with multipeaked tuning curves in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  M L Sutter; C E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; J Van Kylen; R M Birn; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Functional MR imaging during auditory word perception: a single-trial presentation paradigm.

Authors:  G Hickok; T Love; D Swinney; E C Wong; R B Buxton
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers.

Authors:  R A Hedeen; W A Edelstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the central auditory pathway following speech and pure-tone stimuli.

Authors:  S J Millen; V M Haughton; Z Yetkin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Effects of stimulus rate on signal response during functional magnetic resonance imaging of auditory cortex.

Authors:  J R Binder; S M Rao; T A Hammeke; J A Frost; P A Bandettini; J S Hyde
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1994-07

8.  Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  P A Bandettini; A Jesmanowicz; E C Wong; J S Hyde
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Cytochrome oxidase, acetylcholinesterase, and NADPH-diaphorase staining in human supratemporal and insular cortex: evidence for multiple auditory areas.

Authors:  F Rivier; S Clarke
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Comparison of responses in the anterior and primary auditory fields of the ferret cortex.

Authors:  N Kowalski; H Versnel; S A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  307 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation and task effects in auditory processing measured using fMRI.

Authors:  D A Hall; M P Haggard; M A Akeroyd; A Q Summerfield; A R Palmer; M R Elliott; R W Bowtell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural representation of a rhythm depends on its interval ratio.

Authors:  K Sakai; O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; R Takino; T Tamada; N K Iwata; M Nielsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Mismatch responses to randomized gradient switching noise as reflected by fMRI and whole-head magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Klaus Mathiak; Alexander Rapp; Tilo T J Kircher; Wolfgang Grodd; Ingo Hertrich; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Werner Lutzenberger; Hermann Ackermann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Functional asymmetry for auditory processing in human primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joseph T Devlin; Josephine Raley; Elizabeth Tunbridge; Katherine Lanary; Anna Floyer-Lea; Charvy Narain; Ian Cohen; Timothy Behrens; Peter Jezzard; Paul M Matthews; David R Moore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain.

Authors:  J D Warren; S Uppenkamp; R D Patterson; T D Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Reduced Structural Connectivity Between Left Auditory Thalamus and the Motion-Sensitive Planum Temporale in Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Nadja Tschentscher; Anja Ruisinger; Helen Blank; Begoña Díaz; Katharina von Kriegstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.