Literature DB >> 17322311

Defective ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase impairs replication fork progression in Escherichia coli.

Estrella Guarino1, Alfonso Jiménez-Sánchez, Elena C Guzmán.   

Abstract

The observed lengthening of the C period in the presence of a defective ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase has been assumed to be due solely to the low deoxyribonucleotide supply in the nrdA101 mutant strain. We show here that the nrdA101 mutation induces DNA double-strand breaks at the permissive temperature in a recB-deficient background, suggesting an increase in the number of stalled replication forks that could account for the slowing of replication fork progression observed in the nrdA101 strain in a Rec(+) context. These DNA double-strand breaks require the presence of the Holliday junction resolvase RuvABC, indicating that they have been generated from stalled replication forks that were processed by the specific reaction named "replication fork reversal." Viability results supported the occurrence of this process, as specific lethality was observed in the nrdA101 recB double mutant and was suppressed by the additional inactivation of ruvABC. None of these effects seem to be due to the limitation of the deoxyribonucleotide supply in the nrdA101 strain even at the permissive temperature, as we found the same level of DNA double-strand breaks in the nrdA(+) strain growing under limited (2-microg/ml) or under optimal (5-microg/ml) thymidine concentrations. We propose that the presence of an altered NDP reductase, as a component of the replication machinery, impairs the progression of the replication fork, contributing to the lengthening of the C period in the nrdA101 mutant at the permissive temperature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17322311      PMCID: PMC1855873          DOI: 10.1128/JB.01632-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  32 in total

1.  Ribonucleoside diphosphate reductase is a component of the replication hyperstructure in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Elena C Guzmán; José Luis Caballero; Alfonso Jiménez-Sánchez
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.501

2.  Replication fork reversal in DNA polymerase III mutants of Escherichia coli: a role for the beta clamp.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; Marie Seigneur; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Escherichia coli cells with increased levels of DnaA and deficient in recombinational repair have decreased viability.

Authors:  Aline V Grigorian; Rachel B Lustig; Elena C Guzmán; Joseph M Mahaffy; Judith W Zyskind
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Replication restart in gyrB Escherichia coli mutants.

Authors:  Gianfranco Grompone; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Replication fork and SeqA focus distributions in Escherichia coli suggest a replication hyperstructure dependent on nucleotide metabolism.

Authors:  Felipe Molina; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Gianfranco Grompone; Maria-Jose Florès; Vladimir Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Defective gene product in dnaF mutant of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J A Fuchs; H O Karlström; H R Warner; P Reichard
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1972-07-19

8.  Replication time of the chromosome in thymineless mutants of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Zaritsky; R H Pritchard
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1971-08-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  The chromosome of Bacillus subtilis. I. Theory of marker frequency analysis.

Authors:  N Sueoka; H Yoshikawa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 10.  Review lecture on the growth and form of a bacterial cell.

Authors:  R H Pritchard
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1974-02-21       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  12 in total

1.  RecA-dependent replication in the nrdA101(Ts) mutant of Escherichia coli under restrictive conditions.

Authors:  Israel Salguero; Estrella Guarino; Elena C Guzmán
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Replication Restart in Bacteria.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Steven J Sandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Patterns of evolutionary conservation of essential genes correlate with their compensability.

Authors:  Tobias Bergmiller; Martin Ackermann; Olin K Silander
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  Replication fork reversal after replication-transcription collision.

Authors:  Anne L De Septenville; Stéphane Duigou; Hasna Boubakri; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Construction of a nrdA::luxCDABE Fusion and Its Use in Escherichia coli as a DNA Damage Biosensor.

Authors:  Ee Taek Hwang; Joo- Myung Ahn; Byoung Chan Kim; Man Bock Gu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  A bioassay for the detection of benzimidazoles reveals their presence in a range of environmental samples.

Authors:  Terence S Crofts; Yujie Men; Lisa Alvarez-Cohen; Michiko E Taga
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Chromosome Replication in Escherichia coli: Life on the Scales.

Authors:  Vic Norris; Patrick Amar
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2012-10-29

8.  A reduction in ribonucleotide reductase activity slows down the chromosome replication fork but does not change its localization.

Authors:  Ingvild Odsbu; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Correlation between ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase and three replication proteins in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  M Antonia Sánchez-Romero; Felipe Molina; Alfonso Jiménez-Sánchez
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 2.946

Review 10.  Replication Fork Breakage and Restart in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Anurag K Sinha; David R F Leach
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.