Literature DB >> 7836313

Recombinational rescue of the stalled DNA replication fork: a model based on analysis of an Escherichia coli strain with a chromosome region difficult to replicate.

T Horiuchi1, Y Fujimura.   

Abstract

To examine the physiological effects of DNA replication arrest at the terminus (Ter), we constructed a replication-blocked Escherichia coli strain so that both bidirectional replication forks would be impeded at two flanking Ter sites, one artificial and the other natural. While the blocked strain grew slightly more slowly than a control strain, it had abnormal phenotypes similar to those of E. coli dam mutants, i.e., hyper-Rec phenotype, recA(+)- and recB+ (C+)-dependent growth, and constitutive SOS induction. The observation that these two apparently unrelated mutants cause similar phenotypes led us to design a model. We propose that the following sequential events may occur in both strains. A double-strand (ds) break occurs at the blocked replication fork in the blocked strain and at the ongoing fork in the dam mutant, through which RecBCD enzyme enters and degrades the ds DNA molecule, and the degradation product serves as the signal molecule for SOS induction. When RecBCD enzyme meets an appropriately oriented Chi sequence, its DNase activity is converted to recombinase enzyme, which is able to repair the ds end, recombinationally. this model (i) explains the puzzling phenotype of recA and recB (C) mutants and the SOS-inducing phenotype of polA, lig, and dna mutants under restrictive conditions, (ii) provides an interpretation for the role of the Chi sequence, and (iii) suggests a possible key role for homologous recombination with regard to cell survival following the arrest of DNA replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7836313      PMCID: PMC176657          DOI: 10.1128/jb.177.3.783-791.1995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  46 in total

1.  Localized remodeling of the Escherichia coli chromosome: the patchwork of segments refractory and tolerant to inversion near the replication terminus.

Authors:  M I Guijo; J Patte; M del Mar Campos; J M Louarn; J E Rebollo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Recombination enhancement by replication (RER) in Rhizobium etli.

Authors:  E Valencia-Morales; D Romero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Ribosomal DNA replication fork barrier and HOT1 recombination hot spot: shared sequences but independent activities.

Authors:  T R Ward; M L Hoang; R Prusty; C K Lau; R L Keil; W L Fangman; B J Brewer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Recombination is essential for viability of an Escherichia coli dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) mutant.

Authors:  M G Marinus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Tandem repeat recombination induced by replication fork defects in Escherichia coli requires a novel factor, RadC.

Authors:  C J Saveson; S T Lovett
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination.

Authors:  B Michel; M J Flores; E Viguera; G Grompone; M Seigneur; V Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Historical overview: searching for replication help in all of the rec places.

Authors:  M M Cox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  RecA-mediated rescue of Escherichia coli strains with replication forks arrested at the terminus.

Authors:  S Maisnier-Patin; K Nordström; S Dasgupta
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences.

Authors:  Vladimir Bidnenko; S Dusko Ehrlich; Bénédicte Michel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Escherichia coli cells with increased levels of DnaA and deficient in recombinational repair have decreased viability.

Authors:  Aline V Grigorian; Rachel B Lustig; Elena C Guzmán; Joseph M Mahaffy; Judith W Zyskind
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.