Literature DB >> 12110361

Visual illusions affect planning but not control.

Scott Glover1.   

Abstract

Much debate has arisen over how to account for the pattern of effects of visual illusions on action - that is, the findings that illusions affect actions in some circumstances but not others. I propose that this pattern can best be explained by postulating that visual illusions affect the planning of actions but do not affect the on-line control of actions. Strong evidence for this viewpoint comes from recent studies that show 'dynamic illusion effects': a large illusion effect early in a movement, but a decreasing effect as the hand approaches the target. These findings pose difficulties for other models of illusion effects on action.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12110361     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)01920-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  32 in total

1.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping the meaning of words.

Authors:  Scott Glover; David A Rosenbaum; Jeremy Graham; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Hitting moving targets: a dissociation between the use of the target's speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Brouwer; Tom Middelburg; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Manual-aiming bias and the Müller-Lyer illusion: the roles of position and extent information.

Authors:  John Predebon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  No evidence of a lower visual field specialization for visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gord Binsted; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Localization of the subjective vertical during roll, pitch, and recumbent yaw body tilt.

Authors:  Simone B Bortolami; Alberto Pierobon; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.