Literature DB >> 15071718

Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention.

Matt Field1, Karin Mogg, Jessica Zetteler, Brendan P Bradley.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: There has been considerable theoretical interest in attentional biases for drug-related cues. However, there is little research on the component processes of such attentional biases.
OBJECTIVES: We examined initial orienting to, and the maintenance of attention on, alcohol-related cues in heavy and light social drinkers.
METHODS: The present study used a visual probe task to investigate biases in visual orienting to alcohol-related cues. We varied the presentation duration of alcohol-related pictures (200, 500 or 2000 ms) to investigate whether attentional biases operated in initial orienting or the maintenance of attention.
RESULTS: In comparison with light social drinkers, heavy social drinkers had an attentional bias for alcohol pictures which were presented at the longer exposure durations (500 and 2000 ms), but not at the shorter duration of 200 ms. Subjective alcohol craving was correlated with the attentional bias index for alcohol pictures presented for 2000 ms.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that biases in visual orienting to alcohol-related cues in heavy social drinkers operate mainly in the processes involved in the maintenance of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15071718     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-1855-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  25 in total

1.  Attentional bias associated with alcohol cues: differences between heavy and occasional social drinkers.

Authors:  J M Townshend; T Duka
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Appetitve effects of drug cues modelled by pictures of the intake ritual: generality of cue-modulated startle examined with inpatient alcoholics.

Authors:  R F Mucha; A Geier; M Stuhlinger; G Mundle
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Addiction.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 5.  Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches.

Authors:  Ingmar H A Franken
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting.

Authors:  B Bradley; M Field; K Mogg; J De Houwer
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  A questionnaire measure of habitual alcohol use.

Authors:  A Mehrabian; J A Russell
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1978-12

8.  Alcohol abusers' and nonabusers' distraction by alcohol and concern-related stimuli.

Authors:  W M Cox; J P Blount; A M Rozak
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Attentional shifts to smoking cues in smokers.

Authors:  Andrew J Waters; Saul Shiffman; Brendan P Bradley; Karin Mogg
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 10.  A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety.

Authors:  K Mogg; B P Bradley
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1998-09
View more
  85 in total

Review 1.  Attentional bias in problem gambling: a systematic review.

Authors:  Audhild Hønsi; Rune Aune Mentzoni; Helge Molde; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-09

2.  The Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Decision-making, Impulse Control, and Loss of Willpower to Resist Drugs.

Authors:  Xavier Noël; Martial Van Der Linden; Antoine Bechara
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2006-05

3.  Mindfulness training modifies cognitive, affective, and physiological mechanisms implicated in alcohol dependence: results of a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Eric L Garland; Susan A Gaylord; Charlotte A Boettiger; Matthew O Howard
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2010-06

4.  Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol.

Authors:  Matt Field; Brian Eastwood
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Attentional bias for caffeine-related stimuli in high but not moderate or non-caffeine consumers.

Authors:  Martin R Yeomans; Shabnam Javaherian; Heather M Tovey; Lorenzo D Stafford
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers.

Authors:  Tim Schoenmakers; Reinout W Wiers; Matt Field
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Goal- and signal-directed incentive: conditioned approach, seeking, and consumption established with unsweetened alcohol in rats.

Authors:  Marvin D Krank; Susan O'Neill; Kyna Squarey; Jackie Jacob
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Cognitive processes in alcohol binges: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Matt Field; Tim Schoenmakers; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Curr Drug Abuse Rev       Date:  2008-11

9.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

10.  Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Monica L Faulkner; Jessica J Rilee; Steven Yantis; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.