Literature DB >> 16615336

Attentional bias affects change detection.

Richard H Yaxley1, Rolf A Zwaan.   

Abstract

Thirty smokers and 30 nonsmokers participated in a flicker study in which the role of attentional bias in change detection was examined. The participants observed picture pairs of everyday objects flicker on a computer screen until they detected the one object that had changed. In half of the pictures, a smoking-related object (e.g., a lighter) was included among smoking-unrelated objects (e.g., a spoon). Half of the smokers and half of the nonsmokers were aware of the experiment's focus, and the other half were not. The smokers exhibited shorter detection latencies than did the nonsmokers when a smoking object changed and longer detection latencies when a nonsmoking object changed while a smoking object was present, and they exhibited detection latencies similar to those of the nonsmokers when smoking objects were not present. Interestingly, the nonsmokers displayed the same attentional bias as the smokers when they were aware of the experiment's smoking focus, but they did not display any attentional bias when they were unaware. Thus, these findings provide evidence for long-term context-independent, as well as for short-term context-dependent, attentional bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16615336     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The impact of smoking urges on working memory performance.

Authors:  C J Madden; R A Zwaan
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  Detected, selected, and sometimes neglected: cognitive processing of cues in addiction.

Authors:  Frank Ryan
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Smoking urges affect language processing.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; T P Truitt
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures.

Authors:  G W McConkie; C B Currie
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Effects of cue exposure and deprivation on cognitive resources in smokers.

Authors:  M A Sayette; M R Hufford
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1994-11

8.  Change blindness.

Authors:  D J Simons; D T Levin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  A flicker paradigm for inducing change blindness reveals alcohol and cannabis information processing biases in social users.

Authors:  Barry T Jones; Ben C Jones; Helena Smith; Nicola Copley
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.526

10.  Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Matt Field; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.526

View more
  5 in total

1.  Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing.

Authors:  Verena S Bonitz; Robert D Gordon
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2008-10

2.  Light social drinkers are more distracted by irrelevant information from an induced attentional bias than heavy social drinkers.

Authors:  Helen C Knight; Daniel T Smith; David C Knight; Amanda Ellison
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Visual Attention to Antismoking PSAs: Smoking Cues Versus Other Attention-Grabbing Features.

Authors:  Ashley N Sanders-Jackson; Joseph N Cappella; Deborah L Linebarger; Jessica Taylor Piotrowski; Moira O'Keeffe; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Hum Commun Res       Date:  2011-03-01

4.  Motivation and Self-Regulation in Addiction: A Call for Convergence.

Authors:  Cătălina E Köpetz; Carl W Lejuez; Reinout W Wiers; Arie W Kruglanski
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-01

5.  A different kind of weapon focus: simulated training with ballistic weapons reduces change blindness.

Authors:  J Eric T Taylor; Jessica K Witt; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-01-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.