Literature DB >> 19446456

The distribution of polar ejection forces determines the amplitude of chromosome directional instability.

Kevin Ke1, Jun Cheng, Alan J Hunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polar ejection forces have often been hypothesized to guide directional instability of mitotic chromosomes, but a direct link has never been established. This has led, in part, to the resurgence of alternative theories. By taking advantage of extremely precise femtosecond pulsed laser microsurgery, we abruptly alter the magnitude of polar ejection forces by severing vertebrate chromosome arms.
RESULTS: Reduction of polar ejection forces increases the amplitude of directional instability without altering other characteristics, thus establishing a direct link between polar ejection forces and the direction of chromosome movements. We find that polar ejection forces limit the range of chromosome oscillations by increasing the probability that motors at a leading kinetochore abruptly disengage or turn off, leading to a direction reversal.
CONCLUSIONS: From the relation between the change in oscillation amplitude and the amount a chromosome arm is shortened, we are able to map the distribution of polar ejection forces across the spindle, which is surprisingly different from previously assumed distributions. These results allow us to differentiate between the mechanisms proposed to underlie the directional instability of chromosomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446456      PMCID: PMC2712573          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  35 in total

1.  Arrangements of macro- and microchromosomes in chicken cells.

Authors:  F A Habermann; M Cremer; J Walter; G Kreth; J von Hase; K Bauer; J Wienberg; C Cremer; T Cremer; I Solovei
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Daniel Gerlich; Joël Beaudouin; Bernd Kalbfuss; Nathalie Daigle; Roland Eils; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Model of chromosome motility in Drosophila embryos: adaptation of a general mechanism for rapid mitosis.

Authors:  G Civelekoglu-Scholey; D J Sharp; A Mogilner; J M Scholey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Femtosecond laser nanoaxotomy lab-on-a-chip for in vivo nerve regeneration studies.

Authors:  Samuel X Guo; Frederic Bourgeois; Trushal Chokshi; Nicholas J Durr; Massimo A Hilliard; Nikos Chronis; Adela Ben-Yakar
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-04-13       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Chromosome elasticity and mitotic polar ejection force measured in living Drosophila embryos by four-dimensional microscopy-based motion analysis.

Authors:  W F Marshall; J F Marko; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Kinetochores moving away from their associated pole do not exert a significant pushing force on the chromosome.

Authors:  A Khodjakov; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and the metaphase-anaphase transition.

Authors:  Y Zhai; P J Kronebusch; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells.

Authors:  D N Mastronarde; K L McDonald; R Ding; J R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 9.  Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  CHROMOSOME VELOCITY DURING MITOSIS AS A FUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME SIZE AND POSITION.

Authors:  R B NICKLAS
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

Review 2.  Towards a quantitative understanding of mitotic spindle assembly and mechanics.

Authors:  Alex Mogilner; Erin Craig
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Neocentromeres and epigenetically inherited features of centromeres.

Authors:  Laura S Burrack; Judith Berman
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Deformations within moving kinetochores reveal different sites of active and passive force generation.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; E D Salmon; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Minimal model for collective kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Edward J Banigan; Kevin K Chiou; Edward R Ballister; Alyssa M Mayo; Michael A Lampson; Andrea J Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Kif18A and chromokinesins confine centromere movements via microtubule growth suppression and spatial control of kinetochore tension.

Authors:  Jason Stumpff; Michael Wagenbach; Andrew Franck; Charles L Asbury; Linda Wordeman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  "Artificial mitotic spindle" generated by dielectrophoresis and protein micropatterning supports bidirectional transport of kinesin-coated beads.

Authors:  Maruti Uppalapati; Ying-Ming Huang; Vidhya Aravamuthan; Thomas N Jackson; William O Hancock
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Op18 reveals the contribution of nonkinetochore microtubules to the dynamic organization of the vertebrate meiotic spindle.

Authors:  Benjamin R Houghtaling; Ge Yang; Alexandre Matov; Gaudenz Danuser; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Genomic Instability in Cancer: Teetering on the Limit of Tolerance.

Authors:  Noemi Andor; Carlo C Maley; Hanlee P Ji
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  Force and length in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.