Literature DB >> 26417109

Minimal model for collective kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Edward J Banigan1, Kevin K Chiou2, Edward R Ballister3, Alyssa M Mayo3, Michael A Lampson3, Andrea J Liu4.   

Abstract

Chromosome segregation during cell division depends on interactions of kinetochores with dynamic microtubules (MTs). In many eukaryotes, each kinetochore binds multiple MTs, but the collective behavior of these coupled MTs is not well understood. We present a minimal model for collective kinetochore-MT dynamics, based on in vitro measurements of individual MTs and their dependence on force and kinetochore phosphorylation by Aurora B kinase. For a system of multiple MTs connected to the same kinetochore, the force-velocity relation has a bistable regime with two possible steady-state velocities: rapid shortening or slow growth. Bistability, combined with the difference between the growing and shrinking speeds, leads to center-of-mass and breathing oscillations in bioriented sister kinetochore pairs. Kinetochore phosphorylation shifts the bistable region to higher tensions, so that only the rapidly shortening state is stable at low tension. Thus, phosphorylation leads to error correction for kinetochores that are not under tension. We challenged the model with new experiments, using chemically induced dimerization to enhance Aurora B activity at metaphase kinetochores. The model suggests that the experimentally observed disordering of the metaphase plate occurs because phosphorylation increases kinetochore speeds by biasing MTs to shrink. Our minimal model qualitatively captures certain characteristic features of kinetochore dynamics, illustrates how biochemical signals such as phosphorylation may regulate the dynamics, and provides a theoretical framework for understanding other factors that control the dynamics in vivo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aurora B; chromosome oscillations; error correction; metaphase; microtubules

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26417109      PMCID: PMC4611644          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1513512112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  63 in total

1.  Kif18A and chromokinesins confine centromere movements via microtubule growth suppression and spatial control of kinetochore tension.

Authors:  Jason Stumpff; Michael Wagenbach; Andrew Franck; Charles L Asbury; Linda Wordeman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 2.  Protein translocation as a tool: The current rapamycin story.

Authors:  Mateusz Putyrski; Carsten Schultz
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 4.124

3.  Dynamics and length distribution of microtubules under force and confinement.

Authors:  Björn Zelinski; Nina Müller; Jan Kierfeld
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-10-31

4.  Streamlined platform for short hairpin RNA interference and transgenesis in cultured mammalian cells.

Authors:  Piyush Khandelia; Karen Yap; Eugene V Makeyev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mechanism of Aurora B activation by INCENP and inhibition by hesperadin.

Authors:  Fabio Sessa; Marina Mapelli; Claudio Ciferri; Cataldo Tarricone; Liliana B Areces; Thomas R Schneider; P Todd Stukenberg; Andrea Musacchio
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function.

Authors:  Michael A Lampson; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 20.808

7.  Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Krishna K Sarangapani; Andrew F Powers; Christian R Nelson; Steve L Reichow; Hugo Arellano-Santoyo; Tamir Gonen; Jeffrey A Ranish; Charles L Asbury; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The coupling between sister kinetochore directional instability and oscillations in centromere stretch in metaphase PtK1 cells.

Authors:  Xiaohu Wan; Daniela Cimini; Lisa A Cameron; E D Salmon
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Cohesin, condensin, and the intramolecular centromere loop together generate the mitotic chromatin spring.

Authors:  Andrew D Stephens; Julian Haase; Leandra Vicci; Russell M Taylor; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  CHROMOSOME VELOCITY DURING MITOSIS AS A FUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME SIZE AND POSITION.

Authors:  R B NICKLAS
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  11 in total

1.  Geometric Asymmetry Induces Upper Limit of Mitotic Spindle Size.

Authors:  Jingchen Li; Hongyuan Jiang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Mechanisms of chromosome biorientation and bipolar spindle assembly analyzed by computational modeling.

Authors:  Christopher Edelmaier; Adam R Lamson; Zachary R Gergely; Saad Ansari; Robert Blackwell; J Richard McIntosh; Matthew A Glaser; Meredith D Betterton
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Effects of random hydrolysis on biofilament length distributions in a shared subunit pool.

Authors:  Sankeert Satheesan; Binayak Banerjee; Dipjyoti Das
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Modeling reveals cortical dynein-dependent fluctuations in bipolar spindle length.

Authors:  Dayna L Mercadante; Amity L Manning; Sarah D Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.699

5.  Signatures of a macroscopic switching transition for a dynamic microtubule.

Authors:  J S Aparna; Ranjith Padinhateeri; Dibyendu Das
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Metaphase kinetochore movements are regulated by kinesin-8 motors and microtubule dynamic instability.

Authors:  Anna H Klemm; Agneza Bosilj; Matko Gluncˇic; Nenad Pavin; Iva M Tolic
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Cell shape and intercellular adhesion regulate mitotic spindle orientation.

Authors:  Jingchen Li; Longcan Cheng; Hongyuan Jiang
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Mitotic spindle: lessons from theoretical modeling.

Authors:  Iva M Tolić; Nenad Pavin
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I.

Authors:  Misuzu Wakiya; Eriko Nishi; Shinnosuke Kawai; Kohei Yamada; Kazuhiro Katsumata; Ami Hirayasu; Yuta Itabashi; Ayumu Yamamoto
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 6.411

10.  Kinesin-8 effects on mitotic microtubule dynamics contribute to spindle function in fission yeast.

Authors:  Zachary R Gergely; Ammon Crapo; Loren E Hough; J Richard McIntosh; Meredith D Betterton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.