Literature DB >> 12076014

Cone-dominated ERG luminance-response function: the Photopic Hill revisited.

Marianne Rufiange1, Sophie Rousseau, Olga Dembinska, Pierre Lachapelle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In response to progressively brighter stimuli, the b-wave of the photopic ERG gradually augments in amplitude, reaches a plateau for a narrow range of intensities and then rapidly decreases with further increments in the luminance of the flash. This unique luminance-response function was originally introduced as the Photopic Hill. The purpose of this study was to further characterize this unique feature of the cone ERG, investigate if it was only limited to b-wave measurements and if it could be obtained under different photopic background luminances.
METHODS: Photopic ERGs and oscillatory potentials were generated in response to flashes of light ranging from 0.5 to 16 cd m(-2) s in intensity and presented against photopic backgrounds varying from 18 to 525 cd m(-2) in luminance.
RESULTS: All but the brightest background yielded a clear Photopic Hill like luminance-response function which could only be evidenced with the b-wave, the i-wave and OP4 amplitude measurements. Interestingly, the maximal amplitude reached remained almost identical irrespective of the background luminance.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the retinal mechanisms at the origin of the Photopic Hill effect could represent a voltage limitation mechanism, intimately tied to the OFF pathway. The latter would however be intrinsic to the cone system only and not to the entire retinal network since significantly higher peak amplitudes are reached with dark adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12076014     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015265812018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  14 in total

1.  Transient enhancing of cone electroretinograms following exposure to brighter photopic backgrounds.

Authors:  S Rousseau; P Lachapelle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode.

Authors:  M Hébert; P Lachapelle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The photopic hill: a new phenomenon of the light adapted electroretinogram.

Authors:  N Wali; L E Leguire
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Evidence for an intensity-coding oscillatory potential in the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  P Lachapelle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Effects of light adaptation on the response characteristics of human oscillatory potentials.

Authors:  N S Peachey; K R Alexander; D J Derlacki; P Bobak; G A Fishman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-01

6.  Analysis of the photopic electroretinogram recorded before and after dark adaptation.

Authors:  P Lachapelle
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.882

7.  Evidence supportive of a functional discrimination between photopic oscillatory potentials as revealed with cone and rod mediated retinopathies.

Authors:  P Lachapelle; S Rousseau; M McKerral; J Benoit; R C Polomeno; R K Koenekoop; J M Little
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Amplitude decrease of photopic ERG b-wave at higher stimulus intensities in humans.

Authors:  M Kondo; C H Piao; A Tanikawa; M Horiguchi; H Terasaki; Y Miyake
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Push-pull model of the primate photopic electroretinogram: a role for hyperpolarizing neurons in shaping the b-wave.

Authors:  P A Sieving; K Murayama; F Naarendorp
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

View more
  28 in total

1.  Asymmetrical growth of the photopic hill during the light adaptation effect.

Authors:  Marie-Lou Garon; Marianne Rufiange; Ruth Hamilton; Daphne L McCulloch; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Assessing the impact of non-dilating the eye on full-field electroretinogram and standard flash response.

Authors:  A-M Gagné; J Lavoie; M-P Lavoie; A Sasseville; M-C Charron; M Hébert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Recommendations for a toxicological screening ERG procedure in laboratory animals.

Authors:  Serge G Rosolen; Florence Rigaudière; Jean-François Le Gargasson; Mitchell G Brigell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The cone electroretinogram in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne B Fulton; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 5.  The neurovascular retina in retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Anne B Fulton; Ronald M Hansen; Anne Moskowitz; James D Akula
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Human oscillatory potentials: intensity-dependence of timing and amplitude.

Authors:  Heather A Hancock; Timothy W Kraft
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.

Authors:  A M Binns; K E Mortlock; R V North
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.379

8.  Differential changes in retina function with normal aging in humans.

Authors:  Paul R Freund; Juliane Watson; Gregory S Gilmour; Frédéric Gaillard; Yves Sauvé
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  The effects of bandpass filtering on the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram.

Authors:  Mercedes Gauthier; Mathieu Gauvin; Jean-Marc Lina; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.