Literature DB >> 18175183

Power spectral analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment.

Hui Li1, Maryellen L Giger, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Michael R Chinander.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of power law spectral analysis on mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mammograms from 172 subjects (30 women with the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation and 142 low-risk women) were retrospectively collected and digitized. Because age is a very important risk factor, 60 low-risk women were randomly selected from the 142 low-risk subjects and were age matched to the 30 gene mutation carriers. Regions of interest were manually selected from the central breast region behind the nipple of these digitized mammograms and subsequently used in power spectral analysis. The power law spectrum of the form P(f) = B/f(beta) was evaluated for the mammographic patterns. The performance of exponent beta as a decision variable for differentiating between gene mutation carriers and low-risk women was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis for both the entire database and the age-matched subset.
RESULTS: Power spectral analysis of mammograms demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the 30 BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation carriers and the 142 low risk women with an average beta values of 2.92 (+/-0.28) and 2.47(+/-0.20), respectively. An A (z) value of 0.90 was achieved in distinguishing between gene mutation carriers and low-risk women in the entire database, with an A (z) value of 0.89 being achieved on the age-matched subset.
CONCLUSIONS: The BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation carriers and low-risk women have different mammographic parenchymal patterns. It is expected that women identified as high risk by computerized feature analyses might potentially be more aggressively screened for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18175183      PMCID: PMC3043857          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-007-9093-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  29 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data.

Authors:  John J Heine; Robert P Velthuizen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Zhimin Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Li Lan; Barbara L Weber; Ioana Bonta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Li Lan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast.

Authors:  M P Eckstein; J S Whiting
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Anna Margolis; Li Lan; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Deborah Thompson; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Screening mammography in British Columbia: 1988-1993.

Authors:  M G Clay; T G Hislop; L Kan; I A Olivotto; L J Burhenne
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?

Authors:  Jacques Brisson; Caroline Diorio; Benoît Mâsse
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  23 in total

1.  Task-based assessment of breast tomosynthesis: effect of acquisition parameters and quantum noise.

Authors:  I Reiser; R M Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Evaluation of an improved algorithm for producing realistic 3D breast software phantoms: application for mammography.

Authors:  K Bliznakova; S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; N Pallikarakis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: robust texture feature identification and equivalence across devices.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Andrew Oustimov; Yan Wang; Jinbo Chen; Raymond J Acciavatti; Yuanjie Zheng; Shonket Ray; James C Gee; Andrew D A Maidment; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-04-03

4.  Radiomics robustness assessment and classification evaluation: A two-stage method demonstrated on multivendor FFDM.

Authors:  Kayla Robinson; Hui Li; Li Lan; David Schacht; Maryellen Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Breast density estimation from high spectral and spatial resolution MRI.

Authors:  Hui Li; William A Weiss; Milica Medved; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-12-28

6.  Comparative analysis of image-based phenotypes of mammographic density and parenchymal patterns in distinguishing between BRCA1/2 cases, unilateral cancer cases, and controls.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Li Lan; Jyothi Janardanan; Charlene A Sennett
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-11-13

7.  Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images.

Authors:  Emma Engstrom; Ingrid Reiser; Robert Nishikawa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Analysis of parenchymal texture with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammography and implications for cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Lynda C Ikejimba; Predrag R Bakic; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Stephen J Glick; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Chang Sun; Umnouy Ponsukcharoen; Dezheng Huo; Li Lan; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Andrew R Jamieson; Jeremy Bancroft Brown; Anna Di Rienzo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.