Literature DB >> 18085946

Inhibition of return and object-based attentional selection.

Alexandra List1, Lynn C Robertson.   

Abstract

Visual attention research has revealed that attentional allocation can occur in space- and/or object-based coordinates. Using the direct and elegant design of R. Egly, J. Driver, and R. Rafal (1994), the present experiments tested whether space- and object-based inhibition of return (IOR) emerge under similar time courses. The experiments were capable of isolating both space- and object-based effects induced by peripheral and back-to-center cues. The results generally support the contention that spatially nonpredictive cues are effective in producing space-based IOR at a variety of stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) and under a variety of stimulus conditions. Whether facilitatory or inhibitory in direction, the object-based effects occurred over a very different time course than did the space-based effects. Reliable object-based IOR was only found under limited conditions and was tied to the time since the most recent cue (peripheral or central). The finding that object-based effects are generally determined by SOA from the most recent cue may help to resolve discrepancies in the IOR literature. These findings also have implications for the search facilitator role that IOR is purported to play in the guidance of visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085946      PMCID: PMC2559861          DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  37 in total

1.  Objects and their locations in exogenous cuing.

Authors:  K L Schendel; L C Robertson; A Treisman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-05

2.  The effects of occlusion and past experience on the allocation of object-based attention.

Authors:  J Pratt; A B Sekuler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

3.  Local brightness mechanisms sketch out surfaces but do not fill them in: psychophysical evidence in the Kanizsa square.

Authors:  B Dresp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-11

4.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

5.  Attentional tracking and inhibition of return in dynamic displays.

Authors:  H J Müller; A von Mühlenen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

6.  The effect of inducer polarity and contrast on the perception of illusory figures.

Authors:  N Matthews; L Welch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later.

Authors:  J Lupiáñez; E G Milán; F J Tornay; E Madrid; P Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-11

8.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; B Weaver; L M Jerreat; A L Burak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Attention accesses multiple reference frames: evidence from visual neglect.

Authors:  M Behrmann; S P Tipper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  10 in total

1.  Binocular fusion and invariant category learning due to predictive remapping during scanning of a depthful scene with eye movements.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Karthik Srinivasan; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14

2.  Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Chuyao Yan; Raymond M Klein; Zhiguo Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Space-based but not object-based inhibition of return is impaired in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Katherine L Possin; J Vincent Filoteo; David D Song; David P Salmon
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Saccade latency indexes exogenous and endogenous object-based attention.

Authors:  Gözde Şentürk; Adam S Greenberg; Taosheng Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  How prevalent is object-based attention?

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Alexa B Roggeveen; Sarah E Creighton; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Distinct mechanisms subserve location- and object-based visual attention.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chou; Su-Ling Yeh; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-21

7.  Effects of cue validity on attentional selection.

Authors:  Hao Lou; Monicque M Lorist; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Perceived object continuity and spontaneous retrieval of features from an inhibited object.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty.

Authors:  Leslie Drummond; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-05

10.  Different temporal dynamics of object-based attentional allocation for reward and non-reward objects.

Authors:  Fangxing Song; Sicen Zhou; Yunfei Gao; Saisai Hu; Feng Kong; Jingjing Zhao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.