Literature DB >> 12014483

Spherical and irregular aberrations are important for the optimal performance of the human eye.

Y K Nio1, N M Jansonius, V Fidler, E Geraghty, S Norrby, A C Kooijman.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity measured psychophysically at different levels of defocus can be used to evaluate the eye optics. Possible parameters of spherical and irregular aberrations, e.g. relative modulation transfer (RMT), myopic shift, and depth of focus, can be determined from these measurements. The present paper compares measured results of RMT, myopic shift, and depth of focus with the theoretical results found in the two eye models described by Jansonius and Kooijman (1998). The RMT data in the present study agree with those found in other studies, e.g. Campbell and Green (1965) and Jansonius and Kooijman (1997). A new theoretical eye model using a spherical aberration intermediate between those of the eye models described by Jansonius and Kooijman (1998) and an irregular aberration with a typical S.D. of 0.3-0.5 D could adequately explain the measured RMT, myopic shift, and depth of focus data. Both spherical and irregular aberrations increased the depth of focus, but decreased the modulation transfer (MT) at high spatial frequencies at optimum focus. These aberrations, therefore, play an important role in the balance between acuity and depth of focus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12014483     DOI: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00019.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  14 in total

1.  Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality.

Authors:  J S McLellan; P M Prieto; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  [Application of wavefront analysis in clinical and scientific settings. From irregular astigmatism to aberrations of a higher order--Part I: Basic principles].

Authors:  J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Impact of the optical depth of field on cytogenetic image quality.

Authors:  Yuchen Qiu; Xiaodong Chen; Yuhua Li; Bin Zheng; Shibo Li; Wei R Chen; Hong Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  The oblique effect has an optical component: orientation-specific contrast thresholds after correction of high-order aberrations.

Authors:  Ian J Murray; Sarah L Elliott; Aris Pallikaris; John S Werner; Stacey Choi; Humza J Tahir
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The effect of the asphericity of myopic laser ablation profiles on the induction of wavefront aberrations.

Authors:  Jens Bühren; Lana Nagy; Geunyoung Yoon; Scott MacRae; Thomas Kohnen; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Spherical aberration yielding optimum visual performance: evaluation of intraocular lenses using adaptive optics simulation.

Authors:  John S Werner; Sarah L Elliott; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  [Intraindividual comparison of higher order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical IOLs depending on pupil diameter].

Authors:  T Kasper; J Bühren; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.059

8.  Minimum change in spherical aberration that can be perceived.

Authors:  Silvestre Manzanera; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Quality of vision in patients implanted with aspherical and spherical intraocular lens: Intraindividual comparison.

Authors:  Francesco Semeraro; Mario R Romano; Sarah Duse; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Immature visual neural system in children reflected by contrast sensitivity with adaptive optics correction.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Jiawei Zhou; Haoxin Zhao; Yun Dai; Yudong Zhang; Yong Tang; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.