Literature DB >> 19545813

Spherical aberration yielding optimum visual performance: evaluation of intraocular lenses using adaptive optics simulation.

John S Werner1, Sarah L Elliott, Stacey S Choi, Nathan Doble.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of spherical aberration on contrast sensitivity using adaptive optics.
SETTING: Vision Science and Advanced Retinal Imaging Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
METHODS: Contrast sensitivity at 8 cycles per degree was evaluated using an adaptive optics system that permitted aberrations to be measured with a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and controlled by a 109 actuator continuous-surface deformable mirror that was at a plane conjugate to the observer's pupil. Vertical Gabor patches were viewed through a 6.3 mm diameter pupil conjugate aperture. Contrast sensitivity was measured with the deformable mirror set to produce 1 of 5 spherical aberration profiles (-0.2 to +0.2 microm). Contrast sensitivity over the range of spherical aberration was fitted with a polynomial function.
RESULTS: Three subjects (age 21 to 24 years) participated. The measured total mean spherical aberration resulting from the spherical aberration profiles produced by the deformable mirror was between -0.15 microm and +0.25 microm. The peak contrast sensitivity of this function for the 3 subjects combined occurred at +0.06 microm of spherical aberration. The peak contrast sensitivity was also achieved with positive spherical aberration for each subject's data fitted individually (mean 0.09).
CONCLUSION: There was intersubject variability in the measurements; however, the mean visual performance was best with the introduction of a small positive spherical aberration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19545813      PMCID: PMC2701399          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  18 in total

1.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population.

Authors:  J Porter; A Guirao; I G Cox; D R Williams
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Spherical and irregular aberrations are important for the optimal performance of the human eye.

Authors:  Y K Nio; N M Jansonius; V Fidler; E Geraghty; S Norrby; A C Kooijman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  In vivo imaging of the photoreceptor mosaic in retinal dystrophies and correlations with visual function.

Authors:  Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Steven M Jones; John L Keltner; Scot S Olivier; John S Werner
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Adaptive optics simulation of intraocular lenses with modified spherical aberration.

Authors:  Patricia A Piers; Enrique J Fernandez; Silvestre Manzanera; Sverker Norrby; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Phase plates for wave-aberration compensation in the human eye.

Authors:  R Navarro; E Moreno-Barriuso; S Bará; T Mancebo
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 3.776

6.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Role of high-order aberrations in senescent changes in spatial vision.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; Stacey S Choi; Nathan Doble; Joseph L Hardy; Julia W Evans; John S Werner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Personalized correction of spherical aberration in cataract surgery.

Authors:  George H H Beiko
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Distribution of corneal spherical aberration in a comprehensive ophthalmology practice and whether keratometry can predict aberration values.

Authors:  George H H Beiko; Wolfgang Haigis; Andreas Steinmueller
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  3 in total

1.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Comparison of spherical aberration and small-pupil profiles in improving depth of focus for presbyopic corrections.

Authors:  Adam Hickenbotham; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.351

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.