Literature DB >> 26979436

Automatic adjustments toward unseen visual targets during grasping movements.

Zhongting Chen1, Jeffrey A Saunders2.   

Abstract

We investigated whether control of hand movements can be driven by visual information that is not consciously perceived. Subjects performed reach-to-grasp movements toward 2D virtual objects that were projected onto a rigid surface. On perturbed trials, the target object was briefly presented at a different orientation (±20° rotation) or different size (±20 % scaling) during movement. The perturbed objects were presented for 33 ms, followed by a 200-ms mask and reappearance of the original target object. Subjects perceived only the mask and were not aware of the preceding perturbed stimuli. Unperturbed trials were identical except that there was no change in the target object before the mask. Despite being unaware of the brief perturbed stimuli, subjects showed corrective adjustments to their movements: rotation of the grip axis in response to orientation perturbations, and scaling of grip aperture in response to size perturbations. Responses were detectable 250-300 ms after the perturbation onset and began to reduce 250-300 ms after the reappearance of the original target. Our results demonstrate that the visuomotor system can utilize visual information for control of grasping even when this information is not available for conscious perception. We suggest that this dissociation is due to different temporal resolution of visual processing mechanisms underlying conscious perception and control of actions.

Keywords:  Action; Consciousness; Grasping; Online control; Perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26979436     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4613-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  33 in total

1.  Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; R B Tootell; D L Schacter; D N Greve; B Fischl; J D Mendola; B R Rosen; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Jiping He; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  On-line control of pointing is modified by unseen visual shapes.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; James T Enns; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2006-07-18

4.  Postural control of three-dimensional prehension movements.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Online processing of shape information for control of grasping.

Authors:  Zhongting Chen; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.

Authors:  David A Westwood; James Danckert; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-04-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning to detect but not to grasp suppressed visual stimuli.

Authors:  K Ludwig; P Sterzer; N Kathmann; V H Franz; G Hesselmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.

Authors:  M A Goodale; A D Milner; L S Jakobson; D P Carey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  3 in total

1.  Invisible Flashes Alter Perceived Sound Location.

Authors:  Patrycja Delong; Máté Aller; Anette S Giani; Tim Rohe; Verena Conrad; Masataka Watanabe; Uta Noppeney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Miriam L Conway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping.

Authors:  Bruce D Keefe; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.