Literature DB >> 12627961

Mapping out regions on the surface of the aspartate receptor that are essential for kinase activation.

Ryan S Mehan1, Noah C White, Joseph J Falke.   

Abstract

The aspartate receptor of bacterial chemotaxis is representative of a large family of taxis receptors widespread in prokaryotes. The homodimeric receptor associates with cytoplasmic components to form a receptor-kinase signaling complex. Within this complex the receptor is known to directly contact the histidine kinase CheA, the coupling protein CheW, and other receptor dimers. However, the locations and extents of the contact regions on the receptor surface remain ambiguous. The present study applies the protein-interactions-by-cysteine-modification (PICM) method to map out surfaces on the aspartate receptor that are essential for kinase stimulation in the assembled receptor-kinase complex. The approach utilizes 52 engineered cysteine positions scattered over the surface of the receptor periplasmic and cytoplasmic domains. When the bulky, anionic probe 5-fluorescein-maleimide is coupled to these positions, large effects on receptor-mediated kinase stimulation are observed at eight cytoplasmic locations. By contrast, no large effects are observed for probe attachment at exposed positions in the periplasmic domain. The results indicate that essential receptor surface regions are located near the hairpin turn at the distal end of the cytoplasmic domain and in the cytoplasmic adaptation site region. These surface regions include the docking sites for CheA, CheW, and other receptor dimers, as well as surfaces that transmit information from the receptor adaptation sites to the kinase. Smaller effects observed in the cytoplasmic linker or HAMP region suggest this region may also play a role in kinase regulation. A comparison of the activity perturbations caused by a dianionic, bulky probe (5-fluorescein-maleimide), a zwitterionic, bulky probe (5-tetramethyl-rhodamine-maleimide), and a nonionic, smaller probe (N-ethyl-maleimide) reveals the roles of probe size and charge in generating the observed effects on kinase activity. Overall, the results indicate that interactions between the periplasmic domains of different receptor dimers are not required for kinase activation in the signaling complex. By contrast, the observed spatial distribution of protein contact surfaces on the cytoplasmic domain is consistent with both (i) distinct docking sites for cytoplasmic proteins and (ii) interactions between the cytoplasmic domains of different dimers to form a trimer-of-dimers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12627961      PMCID: PMC2902781          DOI: 10.1021/bi027127g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  40 in total

1.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor.

Authors:  K K Kim; H Yokota; S H Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The cytoplasmic helical linker domain of receptor histidine kinase and methyl-accepting proteins is common to many prokaryotic signalling proteins.

Authors:  L Aravind; C P Ponting
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 3.  Bacterial tactic responses.

Authors:  J P Armitage
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.517

4.  Covalent modification regulates ligand binding to receptor complexes in the chemosensory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  G Li; R M Weis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-02-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Attractant regulation of the aspartate receptor-kinase complex: limited cooperative interactions between receptors and effects of the receptor modification state.

Authors:  J A Bornhorst; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes.

Authors:  J J Falke; R B Bass; S L Butler; S A Chervitz; M A Danielson
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 13.827

7.  The aspartate receptor cytoplasmic domain: in situ chemical analysis of structure, mechanism and dynamics.

Authors:  R B Bass; J J Falke
Journal:  Structure       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Detection of a conserved alpha-helix in the kinase-docking region of the aspartate receptor by cysteine and disulfide scanning.

Authors:  R B Bass; J J Falke
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Signaling domain of the aspartate receptor is a helical hairpin with a localized kinase docking surface: cysteine and disulfide scanning studies.

Authors:  R B Bass; M D Coleman; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Cysteine and disulfide scanning reveals two amphiphilic helices in the linker region of the aspartate chemoreceptor.

Authors:  S L Butler; J J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-07-28       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  20 in total

1.  Side chains at the membrane-water interface modulate the signaling state of a transmembrane receptor.

Authors:  Aaron S Miller; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Interactions between the PAS and HAMP domains of the Escherichia coli aerotaxis receptor Aer.

Authors:  Kylie J Watts; Qinhong Ma; Mark S Johnson; Barry L Taylor
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Evolutionary genomics reveals conserved structural determinants of signaling and adaptation in microbial chemoreceptors.

Authors:  Roger P Alexander; Igor B Zhulin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Conserved glycine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor play essential roles in kinase coupling and on-off switching.

Authors:  Matthew D Coleman; Randal B Bass; Ryan S Mehan; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  The receptor-CheW binding interface in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Anh Vu; Xiqing Wang; Hongjun Zhou; Frederick W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Bacterial chemoreceptors and chemoeffectors.

Authors:  Shuangyu Bi; Luhua Lai
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Structure, function, and on-off switching of a core unit contact between CheA kinase and CheW adaptor protein in the bacterial chemosensory array: A disulfide mapping and mutagenesis study.

Authors:  Andrew M Natale; Jane L Duplantis; Kene N Piasta; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Evaluating the Use of Antibody Variable Region (Fv) Charge as a Risk Assessment Tool for Predicting Typical Cynomolgus Monkey Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Daniela Bumbaca Yadav; Vikas K Sharma; Charles Andrew Boswell; Isidro Hotzel; Devin Tesar; Yonglei Shang; Yong Ying; Saloumeh K Fischer; Jane L Grogan; Eugene Y Chiang; Konnie Urban; Sheila Ulufatu; Leslie A Khawli; Saileta Prabhu; Sean Joseph; Robert F Kelley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Engineered socket study of signaling through a four-helix bundle: evidence for a yin-yang mechanism in the kinase control module of the aspartate receptor.

Authors:  Kalin E Swain; Miguel A Gonzalez; Joseph J Falke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Attractant binding alters arrangement of chemoreceptor dimers within its cluster at a cell pole.

Authors:  Motohiro Homma; Daisuke Shiomi; Michio Homma; Ikuro Kawagishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.