Literature DB >> 8142161

Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: the effects of disease and treatment.

T Ibbotson1, P Maguire, P Selby, T Priestman, L Wallace.   

Abstract

The General Health Questionnaire 28 (GHQ 28), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) seemed promising in their ability to detect anxiety and depression in cancer patients. To compare their screening performance, 513 patients were recruited from four cancer centres, and visited at home by a trained interviewer. Paired combinations of questionnaires (GHQ 28 + HADS, GHQ 28 + RSCL or RSCL+HADS) were used, and then the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule was administered to enable a psychiatric diagnosis to be made using DSM III diagnostic criteria. A receiver operating characteristics curve was drawn by plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1-specificity) for each possible score on each questionnaire. In the overall sample, the HADS and RSCL performed well comparably. The HADS did best in those free of disease and when the disease was judged to be stable. Only the RSCL performed well in those with progressive disease. Both the HADS and RSCL were effective in those on treatment. The GHQ was superior to the RSCL in those off treatment. The choice of questionnaire and threshold score should take disease and treatment status into account, but all three questionnaires have a definite role in screening out anxiety and depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8142161     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(05)80015-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  75 in total

1.  Screening for mental disorders in cancer, cardiovascular and musculoskeletal diseases. Comparison of HADS and GHQ-12.

Authors:  Martin Härter; Sonja Woll; Alexandra Wunsch; Jürgen Bengel; Katrin Reuter
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  The Course of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Breast Cancer and Gynaecological Cancer.

Authors:  Reinhold Schwarz; Oliver Krauss; Michael Höckel; Alexandra Meyer; Markus Zenger; Andreas Hinz
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  A review and recommendations for optimal outcome measures of anxiety, depression and general distress in studies evaluating psychosocial interventions for English-speaking adults with heterogeneous cancer diagnoses.

Authors:  Tim Luckett; Phyllis N Butow; Madeleine T King; Mayumi Oguchi; Gaynor Heading; Nadine A Hackl; Nicole Rankin; Melanie A Price
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Validation of two depression screening instruments in a sleep disorders clinic.

Authors:  Mandy Law; Matthew T Naughton; Arup Dhar; David Barton; Eli Dabscheck
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  The relationship between age, anxiety, and depression in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Talia R Weiss Wiesel; Christian J Nelson; William P Tew; Molly Hardt; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Cynthia Owusu; Heidi D Klepin; Cary P Gross; Ajeet Gajra; Stuart M Lichtman; Rupal Ramani; Vani Katheria; Laura Zavala; Arti Hurria
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  The relationship of quality of life and distress in prostate cancer patients compared to the general population.

Authors:  Markus Zenger; Antje Lehmann-Laue; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Thilo Schwalenberg; Alexander Ried; Andreas Hinz
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2010-06-30

7.  Facilitating needs based cancer care for people with a chronic disease: Evaluation of an intervention using a multi-centre interrupted time series design.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Afaf Girgis; Claire Johnson; Geoff Mitchell; Patsy Yates; Linda Kristjanson; Martin Tattersall; Christophe Lecathelinais; David Sibbritt; Brian Kelly; Emma Gorton; David Currow
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  The effect of aromatase inhibition on the cognitive function of older patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Sunita K Patel; Joanne Mortimer; Thehang Luu; George Somlo; Vani Katheria; Rupal Ramani; Kurt Hansen; Tao Feng; Carolyn Chuang; Cheri L Geist; Daniel H S Silverman
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Is my patient suffering clinically significant emotional distress? Demonstration of a probabilities approach to evaluating algorithms for screening for distress.

Authors:  Kerrie Clover; Gregory Leigh Carter; Andrew Mackinnon; Catherine Adams
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The psychosocial evaluation of medically-ill inpatients - accordance between mental disorders and self-rated psychosocial distress.

Authors:  Kurt Fritzsche; Thorsten Burger; Armin Hartmann; Matthias Nübling; Claudia Spahn
Journal:  Psychosoc Med       Date:  2005-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.