PURPOSE: The purpose of these studies was to assess the feasibility and reliability of computerized quality-of-life screening for patients attending an outpatient breast cancer clinic. The screening program involved a computerized administration of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer QUality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The computer software generated a screening report that clinic staff members used in the clinical encounter to assist in identifying quality-of-life problems. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: Two studies are reported. In study I, 36 patients and either their nurses or physicians evaluated the feasibility of the screening program using questionnaires developed for this study. In study II, a separate sample of 50 patients completed both the computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the QLQ-C30 to assess reliability and consistency of responding. RESULTS: The results of study I indicate that the patients found the computerized administration to be an acceptable means of providing staff members with information on day-to-day functioning. Clinic nurses and physicians indicated that the report was useful in identifying problematic quality-of-life domains. The results of study II indicate that the computerized administration is highly correlated with the paper-and-pencil version and has similar internal consistency. Discrepancies in responses were identified, but were at an acceptable level. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of these studies indicate that computerized quality-of-life screening is feasible and may provide reliable data for research and quality assurance studies. Staff evaluations suggest that the written report may provide clinic staff members with a tool for identifying quality-of-life concerns in which individual patients are experiencing difficulty. Potential benefit to patients include productive use of waiting room time, greater efficiency in the assessment process, and an improved likelihood that nurses and physicians will recognize and attend to quality-of-life deficits. The valid, reliable, and efficient identification of important patient quality-of-life concerns allows multidisciplinary team members to focus meaningfully their clinical efforts within their respective areas of responsibility.
PURPOSE: The purpose of these studies was to assess the feasibility and reliability of computerized quality-of-life screening for patients attending an outpatientbreast cancer clinic. The screening program involved a computerized administration of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer QUality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). The computer software generated a screening report that clinic staff members used in the clinical encounter to assist in identifying quality-of-life problems. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: Two studies are reported. In study I, 36 patients and either their nurses or physicians evaluated the feasibility of the screening program using questionnaires developed for this study. In study II, a separate sample of 50 patients completed both the computerized and paper-and-pencil versions of the QLQ-C30 to assess reliability and consistency of responding. RESULTS: The results of study I indicate that the patients found the computerized administration to be an acceptable means of providing staff members with information on day-to-day functioning. Clinic nurses and physicians indicated that the report was useful in identifying problematic quality-of-life domains. The results of study II indicate that the computerized administration is highly correlated with the paper-and-pencil version and has similar internal consistency. Discrepancies in responses were identified, but were at an acceptable level. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results of these studies indicate that computerized quality-of-life screening is feasible and may provide reliable data for research and quality assurance studies. Staff evaluations suggest that the written report may provide clinic staff members with a tool for identifying quality-of-life concerns in which individual patients are experiencing difficulty. Potential benefit to patients include productive use of waiting room time, greater efficiency in the assessment process, and an improved likelihood that nurses and physicians will recognize and attend to quality-of-life deficits. The valid, reliable, and efficient identification of important patient quality-of-life concerns allows multidisciplinary team members to focus meaningfully their clinical efforts within their respective areas of responsibility.
Authors: Alistair E Ring; Kerry A Cheong; Claire L Watkins; David Meddis; David Cella; Peter G Harper Journal: Patient Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 3.883