Literature DB >> 12002710

PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration.

Gerhard W Goerres1, Ehab Kamel, Thai-Nia H Heidelberg, Michael R Schwitter, Cyrill Burger, Gustav K von Schulthess.   

Abstract

Because anatomical information on fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) images is limited, combination with structural imaging is often important. In principle, software co-registration of PET and computed tomography (CT) data or dual-modality imaging using a combined PET-CT camera has an important role to play, since "hardware-co-registered" images are thereby made available. A major unanswered question is under which breathing protocol the respiration level in the CT images of a patient will best match the PET images, which represent summed images over many breathing cycles. To address this issue, 28 tumour patients undergoing routine FDG PET examinations were included in this study. In ten patients, PET and CT were performed using a new combined high-performance in-line PET-CT camera without the need for repositioning of the patient, while in 18 patients imaging was performed on separate scanners located close to each other. CT was performed at four respiration levels: free breathing (FB), maximal inspiration (MaxInsp), maximal expiration (MaxExp) and normal expiration (NormExp). The following distances were measured: (a) between a reference point taken to be the anterior superior edge of intervertebral disc space T10-11 and the apex of the lung, (b) from the apex of the lung to the top of the diaphragm, (c) from the apex of the lung to the costo-diaphragmatic recess and (d) from the reference point to the lateral thoracic wall. Differences between CT and corresponding PET images in respect of these distances were compared. In addition, for each of 15 lung tumours in 12 patients, changes in tumour position between PET and CT using the same protocol were measured. CT during NormExp showed the best fit with PET, followed by CT during FB. The mean differences in movement of the diaphragmatic dome on CT during NormExp, FB, MaxInsp and MaxExp, as compared with its level on PET scan, were, respectively, 0.4 mm (SD 11.7), -11.6 mm (13.3), -44.4 mm (25.5) and -9.5 mm (25.6). CT acquired in MaxExp and MaxInsp is not suitable for image co-registration owing to the poor match of images in MaxInsp and because of difficulties with patient performance in MaxExp. With reference to lung lesions, NormExp showed the best results, with a higher probability of a good match and a smaller range of measured values in comparison with FB. Image misregistration in combined PET-CT imaging can be minimized to dimensions comparable to the spatial resolution of modern PET scanners. For PET-CT image co-registration, the use of a normal expiration breath-hold protocol for CT acquisition is recommended, independent of whether combined PET-CT systems or stand-alone systems are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12002710     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-001-0710-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  63 in total

1.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; Gerald Antoch; Todd Blodgett; Lutz F Freudenberg; Tim Akhurst; Stephan Mueller
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Impact of technology on the utilisation of positron emission tomography in lymphoma: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  D Visvikis; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Clinical evaluation of a breathing protocol for PET/CT.

Authors:  Ramon de Juan; Burkhardt Seifert; Thomas Berthold; Gustav K von Schulthess; Gerhard W Goerres
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT.

Authors:  Medhat M Osman; Christian Cohade; Yuji Nakamoto; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Accuracy of image fusion of normal upper abdominal organs visualized with PET/CT.

Authors:  Yuji Nakamoto; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Christian Cohade; Medhat Osman; Laura T Marshall; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  PET/CT: a new imaging technology in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Yusuf E Erdi; Steven M Larson; Henry W D Yeung
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Clinical utility of co-registered respiratory-gated( 99m)Tc-Technegas/MAA SPECT-CT images in the assessment of regional lung functional impairment in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Suga; Yasuhiko Kawakami; Mohammed Zaki; Tomio Yamashita; Kensaku Shimizu; Naofumi Matsunaga
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  The new-generation positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners: implications for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Stephen L Bacharach
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Patient-specific biomechanical model as whole-body CT image registration tool.

Authors:  Mao Li; Karol Miller; Grand Roman Joldes; Barry Doyle; Revanth Reddy Garlapati; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  Cine CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Steve Kohlmyer; Kelley Branch; Grace Chen; James Caldwell; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.