Literature DB >> 11958721

Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports.

M Nieves Pérez-Mata1, J Don Read, Margarita Diges.   

Abstract

Lists of thematically related words were presented to participants with or without a concurrent task. In Experiments 1 and 2, respectively, English or Spanish word lists were either low or high in concreteness (concrete vs abstract words) and were presented, respectively, auditorily or visually for study. The addition of a concurrent visual or auditory task, respectively, substantially reduced correct recall and doubled the frequency of false memory reports (nonstudied critical or theme words). Divided attention was interpreted as having reduced the opportunity for participants to monitor successfully their elicitations of critical associates. Comparisons of concrete and abstract lists revealed significantly more recalls of false memories for abstract than concrete word lists. Comparisons between two levels of attention, two levels of word concreteness, and two presentation modalities failed to support the "more is less" effect by which enhanced correct recall is accompanied by increased frequencies of false memories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11958721     DOI: 10.1080/09658210143000308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  14 in total

1.  "Identify-to-reject": a specific strategy to avoid false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Paula Carneiro; Angel Fernandez; Emiliano Diez; Leonel Garcia-Marques; Tânia Ramos; Mário B Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-02

Review 2.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  When do false memories cross language boundaries in English-Spanish bilinguals?

Authors:  Brooke H Sahlin; Matthew G Harding; John G Seamon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

4.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

5.  The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Christopher Barry; Ellen R Swannell; Selna J Holmes; Gemma L Bathurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

6.  The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.

Authors:  Enmanuelle Pardilla-Delgado; Jessica D Payne
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Working memory differences in illusory recollection of critical lures.

Authors:  Michael T Bixter; Frances Daniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07

9.  Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object.

Authors:  Cheng-Ta Yang; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-01-30

10.  False memory and importance: can we prioritize encoding without consequence?

Authors:  Dung C Bui; Michael C Friedman; Ian M McDonough; Alan D Castel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.