Literature DB >> 18231809

Memory error in recognizing a pre-change object.

Cheng-Ta Yang1, Yei-Yu Yeh.   

Abstract

People often fail to detect a change between two visual scenes and retrieval failure has been suggested as a reason. We investigated the possibility that retrieval blocking underlies this failure by examining the error pattern in recognizing the pre-change object. The results of Experiment 1 showed that participants were biased toward selecting the lure that was similar to the post-change object when they failed to recognize the pre-change object. This bias was also observed in Experiment 2 when there was sufficient time to encode and consolidate the pre-change object and the bias was as strong as correct recognition in Experiment 3 when participants divided attention during encoding and comparison. The bias in memory error remained significant even when participants had the option to select an "I don't remember" response in Experiment 4. In Experiment 5, the bias was observed after participants successfully detected a change at an invalidly cued location and after they failed to detect a change at a validly cued location. These findings suggest that blocking can lead to retrieval failure in change detection when participants are aware of a change yet unable to retrieve verbatim traces and also when participants are unaware of a change and use the post-change object to retrieve the identity of the previous object at the same location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18231809     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0134-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  27 in total

Review 1.  Seeing, sensing, and scrutinizing.

Authors:  R A Rensink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Structure and strategy in the associative false memory paradigm.

Authors:  L K Libby; U Neisser
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001-05

3.  To see and remember: visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; C C Williams; J M Henderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

4.  The relationship between change detection and recognition of centrally attended objects in motion pictures.

Authors:  Bonnie L Angelone; Daniel T Levin; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Importing perceived features into false memories.

Authors:  Keith B Lyle; Marcia K Johnson
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-02

7.  Creating false memories for visual scenes.

Authors:  M B Miller; M S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: memory retrieval as a model case.

Authors:  M C Anderson; B A Spellman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search.

Authors:  S Yantis; J Jonides
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  Change blindness: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Daniel J Simons; Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.