Literature DB >> 17848024

The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested.

Stephen A Dewhurst1, Christopher Barry, Ellen R Swannell, Selna J Holmes, Gemma L Bathurst.   

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated the effects of divided attention on false memory, using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants studied six DRM lists with full attention and six in one of two divided-attention conditions (random number generation or digit monitoring). Both divided-attention conditions increased false recall of related words (Experiment 1) but reduced false recognition (Experiment 2). These results were confirmed in Experiment 3, in which the type of secondary task was manipulated within groups. We argue that the increase in false recall with divided attention reflects a change in participants' response criterion, whereas the decrease in false recognition occurs because the secondary tasks prevent participants from generating associates of the words presented at study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848024     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.

Authors:  J T Wixted; V Stretch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  False recall and false recognition induced by presentation of associated words: effects of retention interval and level of processing.

Authors:  A Thapar; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

3.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  FALSE RECOGNITION PRODUCED BY IMPLICIT VERBAL RESPONSES.

Authors:  B J UNDERWOOD
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

5.  On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.

Authors:  J DEESE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-07

6.  Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory.

Authors:  J M Gardiner; A J Parkin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-11

7.  Functional aspects of recollective experience.

Authors:  J M Gardiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-07

Review 8.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Effects of divided attention and word concreteness on correct recall and false memory reports.

Authors:  M Nieves Pérez-Mata; J Don Read; Margarita Diges
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002-05

10.  "If I didn't write it, why would I remember it?" Effects of encoding, attention, and practice on accurate and false memory.

Authors:  John G Seamon; Madeleine S Goodkind; Adam D Dumey; Ester Dick; Marla S Aufseeser; Sarah E Strickland; Jeffrey R Woulfin; Nicholas S Fung
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

2.  Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Dawn M McBride; Miia-Liisa Termonen; J Cooper Cutting
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  The effects of divided attention at study and test on false recognition: a comparison of DRM and categorized lists.

Authors:  Lauren M Knott; Stephen A Dewhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

4.  Attentional responses on an auditory oddball predict false memory susceptibility.

Authors:  John E Kiat; Dianna Long; Robert F Belli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Study modality and false recall.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

6.  Why am I not photogenic? Differences in face memory for the self and others.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Hideaki Kawabata
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-08-28

7.  The Effects of Feedback on Memory Strategies of Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Xin Zhang; Meng Luo; Haiyan Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The impact of individual differences on jurors' note taking during trials and recall of trial evidence, and the association between the type of evidence recalled and verdicts.

Authors:  Joanna Lorek; Luna C M Centifanti; Minna Lyons; Craig Thorley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The role of attention in immediate emotional false memory enhancement.

Authors:  Lauren M Knott; Mark L Howe; Enrico Toffalini; Datin Shah; Louise Humphreys
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2018-06-21

10.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on specific and gist-based associative episodic memory.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Greene; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.