Literature DB >> 2141355

Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).

D A Balota1, J I Chumbley.   

Abstract

Balota and Chumbley's studies led them to conclude that category verification, lexical decision, and pronunciation tasks involve combinations of processes that cause them to produce differing estimates of the relation between word frequency and ease of lexical identification. Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard challenged Balota and Chumbley's empirical evidence and conclusions, provided empirical evidence to support their challenge, and presented an alternative theoretical position. We show that Monsell et al.'s experiments, analyses, and theoretical perspective do not result in conclusions about the role of word frequency in category verification, lexical decision, and pronunciation that differ from those of Balota and Chumbley.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2141355     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.119.2.231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  15 in total

1.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

2.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Pablo Gomez; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.

Authors:  Paul D Siakaluk; Lori Buchanan; Chris Westbury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

4.  Basic processes in reading: a critical review of pseudohomophone effects in reading aloud and a new computational account.

Authors:  Michael Reynolds; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

5.  Comparing ease-of-processing values of the same set of words for native English speakers and Japanese learners of English.

Authors:  Hiroomi Takashima
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2009-05-30

6.  More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis.

Authors:  Tamar H Gollan; Rosa I Montoya; Cynthia Cera; Tiffany C Sandoval
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Language production: Methods and methodologies.

Authors:  K Bock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

8.  The effect of semantic priming on the detection of letters within words.

Authors:  T L Blum; N F Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-05

9.  Frequency and regularity effects in reading are task dependent: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Danielle S Dickson; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Word-specific repetition effects revealed by MEG and the implications for lexical access.

Authors:  Diogo Almeida; David Poeppel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.