Literature DB >> 12699147

The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.

Paul D Siakaluk1, Lori Buchanan, Chris Westbury.   

Abstract

The effect of semantic distance (Lund & Burgess, 1996) was examined in three semantic categorization experiments. Experiment 1, a yes/no task that required participants to make animal/nonanimal judgments by responding to both sets of stimuli (Forster & Shen, 1996), revealed no effect of semantic distance. Experiment 2, a go/no-go task that required participants to respond to only the experimental (i.e., nonanimal) items, revealed a large effect of semantic distance. In addition, response latencies were longer and error rates were lower to the experimental items in Experiment 2 than to those in Experiment 1. These findings were replicated in Experiment 3, in which semantic distance and task condition were manipulated within subjects. We conclude that these results are consistent with (1) the view that the go/no-go tasks elicited more extensive processing of the experimental items and (2) a connectionist account of semantic activation, whereby processing is facilitated by the presence of semantic neighbors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12699147     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  31 in total

1.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?

Authors:  P M Pexman; S J Lupker
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1999-12

2.  Reading homographs: orthographic, phonologic, and semantic dynamics.

Authors:  L R Gottlob; S D Goldinger; G O Stone; G C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.

Authors:  Yasushi Hino; Stephen J Lupker; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.

Authors:  G Measso; E Zaidel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition.

Authors:  P Gibbs; G C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-06

7.  Semantic effects in single-word naming.

Authors:  E Strain; K Patterson; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

9.  Lexical ambiguity and the timecourse of attentional allocation in word recognition.

Authors:  G Kellas; F R Ferraro; G B Simpson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  11 in total

1.  Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: a test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Isabel Fraga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

2.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

4.  There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.

Authors:  Penny M Pexman; Ian S Hargreaves; Paul D Siakaluk; Glen E Bodner; Jamie Pope
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

5.  Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  The influence of perceptual and semantic categorization on inhibitory processing as measured by the N2-P3 response.

Authors:  Mandy J Maguire; Matthew R Brier; Patricia S Moore; Thomas C Ferree; Dylan Ray; Stewart Mostofsky; John Hart; Michael A Kraut
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Some Insults are Easier to Detect: The Embodied Insult Detection Effect.

Authors:  Michele Wellsby; Paul D Siakaluk; Penny M Pexman; William J Owen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-16

8.  The influence of print exposure on the body-object interaction effect in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Dana Hansen; Paul D Siakaluk; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Exploring the relationship between semantics and space.

Authors:  Patrizia Turriziani; Massimiliano Oliveri; Sonia Bonnì; Giacomo Koch; Daniela Smirni; Lisa Cipolotti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Semantic Neighborhood Effects for Abstract versus Concrete Words.

Authors:  Ashley N Danguecan; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.