Literature DB >> 11957399

Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

William D Hopkins1, David A Washburn.   

Abstract

This study was designed to examine whether chimpanzees and monkeys exhibit a global-to-local precedence in the processing of hierarchically organized compound stimuli, as has been reported for humans. Subjects were tested using a sequential matching-to-sample paradigm using stimuli that differed on the basis of their global configuration or local elements, or on both perceptual attributes. Although both species were able to discriminate stimuli on the basis of their global configuration or local elements, the chimpanzees exhibited a global-to-local processing strategy, whereas the rhesus monkeys exhibited a local-to-global processing strategy. The results suggest that perceptual and attentional mechanisms underlying information-processing strategies may account for differences in learning by primates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11957399      PMCID: PMC2043159          DOI: 10.1007/s10071-001-0121-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  11 in total

1.  Testing primates with joystick-based automated apparatus: lessons from the Language Research Center's Computerized Test System.

Authors:  D A Washburn; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: a critical review.

Authors:  R Kimchi
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Attention in humans and animals: is there a capacity limitation at the time of encoding?

Authors:  M R Lamb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-01

4.  Information-processing by pigeons.

Authors:  W S Maki; T C Leuin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Selective attention: effects of cuing on the processing of different types of compound stimuli.

Authors:  M R Lamb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1988-01

6.  Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio).

Authors:  J Fagot; C Deruelle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Video-task assessment of learning and memory in macaques (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus movement on performance.

Authors:  D A Washburn; W D Hopkins; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1989-10

8.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing of hierarchical visual stimuli in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  W D Hopkins
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  W D Hopkins; D A Washburn; D M Rumbaugh
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Hemispheric lateralisation and global precedence effects in the processing of visual stimuli by humans and baboons (Papio papio).

Authors:  C Deruelle; J Fagot
Journal:  Laterality       Date:  1997
View more
  22 in total

1.  Natural concepts in a juvenile gorilla (gorilla gorilla gorilla) at three levels of abstraction.

Authors:  Jennifer Vonk; Suzanne E MacDonald
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Julie J Neiworth; Amy J Gleichman; Anne S Olinick; Kristen E Lamp
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Brielle T James; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Adrian G Dyer; Noha Ferrah; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Illusional Perspective across Humans and Bees.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Christian Agrillo; Simone Cutini
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

8.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 9.  A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates.

Authors:  Toyomi Matsuno; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.163

10.  Can old-world and new-world monkeys judge spatial above/below relations to be the same or different? Some of them, but not all of them.

Authors:  Roger K R Thompson; Timothy M Flemming; Carl Erick Hagmann
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 1.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.