Literature DB >> 9104003

Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio).

J Fagot1, C Deruelle.   

Abstract

Global precedence was examined in 8 baboons and 14 humans using compound stimuli presented in the left visual hemifield (LVF) or the right visual hemifield (RVF). Humans showed a global advantage and global-to-local interference. Baboons showed a local advantage and no interference. For humans and baboons, a LVF advantage appeared for global matching and an unsignificant RVF advantage appeared for local matching. The local advantage in baboons still emerged when the memory load of the task was removed and when the local elements were connected by lines or were adjacent. Moreover, global precedence in humans persisted with unfamiliar forms. Species differences suggest that global precedence is not a universal trait and that this effect in humans does not have a purely perceptual or sensory basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9104003     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.2.429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  27 in total

1.  The processing of positional information in a two-item sequence limits the emergence of symmetry in baboons (Papio papio), but not in humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Joël Fagot; Raphaelle Malassis; Tiphaine Medam
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  First- and second-order configural sensitivity for greeble stimuli in baboons.

Authors:  Carole Parron; Joël Fagot
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Global and local processing in adult humans (Homo sapiens), 5-year-old children (Homo sapiens), and adult cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Julie J Neiworth; Amy J Gleichman; Anne S Olinick; Kristen E Lamp
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Exploring whether nonhuman primates show a bias to overestimate dense quantities.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Brielle T James; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.231

5.  Analogical reasoning and the differential outcome effect: transitory bridging of the conceptual gap for rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Timothy M Flemming; Roger K R Thompson; Michael J Beran; David A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2011-07

6.  Eye preferences in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella).

Authors:  Duncan A Wilson; Masaki Tomonaga; Sarah-Jane Vick
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; David Aagten-Murphy; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Representing the forest before the trees: a global advantage effect in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Arun P Sripati; Carl R Olson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.