Literature DB >> 25473017

The forest or the trees: preference for global over local image processing is reversed by prior experience in honeybees.

Aurore Avarguès-Weber1, Adrian G Dyer2, Noha Ferrah3, Martin Giurfa4.   

Abstract

Traditional models of insect vision have assumed that insects are only capable of low-level analysis of local cues and are incapable of global, holistic perception. However, recent studies on honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision have refuted this view by showing that this insect also processes complex visual information by using spatial configurations or relational rules. In the light of these findings, we asked whether bees prioritize global configurations or local cues by setting these two levels of image analysis in competition. We trained individual free-flying honeybees to discriminate hierarchical visual stimuli within a Y-maze and tested bees with novel stimuli in which local and/or global cues were manipulated. We demonstrate that even when local information is accessible, bees prefer global information, thus relying mainly on the object's spatial configuration rather than on elemental, local information. This preference can be reversed if bees are pre-trained to discriminate isolated local cues. In this case, bees prefer the hierarchical stimuli with the local elements previously primed even if they build an incorrect global configuration. Pre-training with local cues induces a generic attentional bias towards any local elements as local information is prioritized in the test, even if the local cues used in the test are different from the pre-trained ones. Our results thus underline the plasticity of visual processing in insects and provide new insights for the comparative analysis of visual recognition in humans and animals.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera; attention; honeybee; perceptual grouping; priming; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25473017      PMCID: PMC4286040          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  78 in total

1.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; P Skudlarski; J C Gore; A W Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition.

Authors:  Aude Oliva; Antonio Torralba
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Processing of global and local visual information and hemispheric specialization in humans (Homo sapiens) and baboons (Papio papio).

Authors:  J Fagot; C Deruelle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

8.  The influence of training length on generalization of visual feature assemblies in honeybees.

Authors:  Silke Stach; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Differential effects of visual context on pattern discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens).

Authors:  Debbie M Kelly; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 10.  Visual object recognition.

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 12.449

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Attention-like processes in insects.

Authors:  Vivek Nityananda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Signal or cue: the role of structural colors in flower pollination.

Authors:  Jair E Garcia; Mani Shrestha; Scarlett R Howard; Phred Petersen; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.624

4.  Honeybees use absolute rather than relative numerosity in number discrimination.

Authors:  Maria Bortot; Christian Agrillo; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Angelo Bisazza; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  Illusional Perspective across Humans and Bees.

Authors:  Elia Gatto; Olli J Loukola; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini; Christian Agrillo; Simone Cutini
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

6.  Investigating attentional scope as a novel indicator of emotional state in animals.

Authors:  Anne Hamlaoui; Linda Keeling; Oliver Burman; Else Verbeek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Wild non-eusocial bees learn a colour discrimination task in response to simulated predation events.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2021-06-21

8.  Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Valerie Finke; Márton Nagy; Tūnde Szabó; Daniele d'Amaro; Adrian G Dyer; József Fiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Resources or landmarks: which factors drive homing success in Tetragonula carbonaria foraging in natural and disturbed landscapes?

Authors:  Sara D Leonhardt; Benjamin F Kaluza; Helen Wallace; Tim A Heard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Individual recognition is associated with holistic face processing in Polistes paper wasps in a species-specific way.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Tibbetts; Juanita Pardo-Sanchez; Julliana Ramirez-Matias; Aurore Avarguès-Weber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.