Literature DB >> 17748654

Information-processing by pigeons.

W S Maki, T C Leuin.   

Abstract

Two pigeons matched to sample on the basis of color or line orientation when a sample consisted of a value for each stimulus dimension or a value for only one dimension. When the duration of the sample stimulus was varied to maintain constant performance, compound stimuli required more time than single elements.

Year:  1972        PMID： 17748654     DOI： 10.1126/science.176.4034.535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN： 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  10 in total

1.  Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis.

Authors:  D E Carter; T J Werner
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Temporal factors influencing the pigeon's successive matching-to-sample performance: sample duration, intertrial interval, and retention interval.

Authors:  K R Nelson; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Differential sample response schedules in the acquisition of conditional discriminations by pigeons.

Authors:  L R Cohen; T A Looney; J H Brady; A F Aucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Transfer of matching-to-sample in pigeons.

Authors:  G W Farthing; M J Opuda
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Divided attention performance and the matching law.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Divided attention and the matching law: sample duration affects sensitivity to reinforcement allocation.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Shared attention in pigeons.

Authors:  W S Maki; C R Leith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Differential reinforcement and resistance to change of divided-attention performance.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Eric Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  R Stromer; W J McIlvane; W V Dube; H A Mackay
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  William D Hopkins; David A Washburn
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.084
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.