Literature DB >> 17089590

Determinants of range effects in face recognition.

Eric L Verbeek1, Marcia L Spetch, Ken Cheng, Colin W G Clifford.   

Abstract

The effects of test stimulus range on generalization gradients in humans were assessed for discriminations between faces that varied in brightness, faces that varied in orientation in the picture plane, and morphed faces. In Experiment 1, significant range effects, predicted by adaptation level theory, occurred when faces varied along the brightness or orientation dimension, but not for morphed faces. Changing the difficulty of discrimination of both training and test stimuli for Experiment 2 produced range effects in morphed faces. Experiment 3 explored training and testing stimulus factors as determinants of range effects in morphed faces. The results suggest that sufficiently biased testing ranges create shifts in response distributions (generalization gradients), and this may be amplified byusing relatively difficult discriminations between training stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089590     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  14 in total

1.  The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  D R THOMAS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-07

2.  Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1959-11

3.  Adaptation to natural facial categories.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Daniel Kaping; Yoko Mizokami; Paul Duhamel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Peak shift revisited: a test of alternative interpretations.

Authors:  D R Thomas; K Mood; S Morrison; E Wiertelak
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1991-04

5.  Adaptation-level as frame of reference for prediction of psychophysical data.

Authors:  H HELSON
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1947-01

6.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Generalization gradients following differential intradimensional autoshaping.

Authors:  G B Nallan; D F McCoy; G M Pace; R Welch
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-04

Review 8.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals.

Authors:  S Appelle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Postdiscrimination gradients of human subjects on a tone continuum.

Authors:  A Baron
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-12

10.  Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?

Authors:  Stephan M Collishaw; Graham J Hole
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  2 in total

1.  Shifts in postdiscrimination gradients within a stimulus dimension based on bilateral facial symmetry.

Authors:  Adam Derenne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Learning-related shifts in generalization gradients for complex sounds.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Barbara A Church; Eduardo Mercado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.986

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.