Literature DB >> 11950045

Polyetheretherketone--cytotoxicity and mutagenicity in vitro.

A Katzer1, H Marquardt, J Westendorf, J V Wening, G von Foerster.   

Abstract

The results of the incubation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fibre material with seven different genotype variants of salmonella bacterium showed with and without an external metabolic activation system (S9) with no mutagenic or cytotoxic activity of the test material. In the so-called "plate incorporation test" in which the PEEK raw material is finely cut and applied direct to the agar plate without the addition of solvent there was, as expected, no evidence of cytotoxic or mutagenic effects. In the HPRT test there was a significant increase in the number of mutants per dish, both after addition of N-acetylaminofluorene and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (with and without an external metabolic activation system = +S9), but not after treatment of the cells with PEEK-DMSO-eluate. This means that the PEEK material under study did not release any substances that cause V79 cells to mutate. The investigation of the toxic reaction on the material under study revealed that the number of surviving colonies per 10(5) surviving cells lay within the range of or below the solvent control even in the presence of high PEEK concentrations (5.0 microg/ml). Therefore, in summary, the study produced no evidence of cell damage caused by PEEK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11950045     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00300-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  36 in total

1.  Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces.

Authors:  D Briem; S Strametz; K Schröder; N M Meenen; W Lehmann; W Linhart; A Ohl; J M Rueger
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone cages with two anchoring clips placed in the upper and lower vertebrae, respectively.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Ming Gong; Liangping Li; Ting Yu; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method.

Authors:  João Rodrigo Sarot; Cintia Mussi Milani Contar; Ariadne Cristiane Cabral da Cruz; Ricardo de Souza Magini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  The long-term mechanical integrity of non-reinforced PEEK-OPTIMA polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite-element analysis.

Authors:  Stephen J Ferguson; Judith M A Visser; Anne Polikeit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Customized Barrier Membrane (Titanium Alloy, Poly Ether-Ether Ketone and Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactide) for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yilin Shi; Jin Liu; Mi Du; Shengben Zhang; Yue Liu; Hu Yang; Ruiwen Shi; Yuanyuan Guo; Feng Song; Yajun Zhao; Jing Lan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Two-level contiguous cervical disc disease treated with peek cages packed with demineralized bone matrix: results of 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Kivanç Topuz; Ahmet Colak; Serdar Kaya; Hakan Simşek; Murat Kutlay; Mehmet Nusret Demircan; Murat Velioğlu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Jen-Chung Liao; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen; Lih-Huei Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion using PEEK anatomical cervical cage and allograft bone.

Authors:  C Faldini; M Chehrassan; M T Miscione; F Acri; M d'Amato; C Pungetti; D Luciani; S Giannini
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-17

10.  Comparative evaluation of bone-filled Polymethylmethacrylate implant, autograft fusion, and Polyetheretherketone cervical cage fusion for the treatment of single -level cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Tamer Orief; Ismael Ramadan; Zaki Seddik; Marwan Kamal; Mohamed Rahmany; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.