Literature DB >> 15940477

The long-term mechanical integrity of non-reinforced PEEK-OPTIMA polymer for demanding spinal applications: experimental and finite-element analysis.

Stephen J Ferguson1, Judith M A Visser, Anne Polikeit.   

Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a novel polymer with potential advantages for its use in demanding orthopaedic applications (e.g. intervertebral cages). However, the influence of a physiological environment on the mechanical stability of PEEK has not been reported. Furthermore, the suitability of the polymer for use in highly stressed spinal implants such as intervertebral cages has not been investigated. Therefore, a combined experimental and analytical study was performed to address these open questions. A quasi-static mechanical compression test was performed to compare the initial mechanical properties of PEEK-OPTIMA polymer in a dry, room-temperature and in an aqueous, 37 degrees C environment (n=10 per group). The creep behaviour of cylindrical PEEK polymer specimens (n=6) was measured in a simulated physiological environment at an applied stress level of 10 MPa for a loading duration of 2000 hours (12 weeks). To compare the biomechanical performance of different intervertebral cage types made from PEEK and titanium under complex loading conditions, a three-dimensional finite element model of a functional spinal unit was created. The elastic modulus of PEEK polymer specimens in a physiological environment was 1.8% lower than that of specimens tested at dry, room temperature conditions (P<0.001). The results from the creep test showed an average creep strain of less than 0.1% after 2000 hours of loading. The finite element analysis demonstrated high strain and stress concentrations at the bone/implant interface, emphasizing the importance of cage geometry for load distribution. The stress and strain maxima in the implants were well below the material strength limits of PEEK. In summary, the experimental results verified the mechanical stability of the PEEK-OPTIMA polymer in a simulated physiological environment, and over extended loading periods. Finite element analysis supported the use of PEEK-OPTIMA for load-bearing intervertebral implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15940477      PMCID: PMC3489413          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0915-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  [Experimental protocol for mechanical characterization of a femoral implant of carbon-Peek composite hip prosthesis in fatigue].

Authors:  J Soyer
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1997-01

2.  Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants.

Authors:  S D Cook; A M Rust-Dawicki
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Numerical and experimental stress analysis of a polymeric composite hip joint prosthesis.

Authors:  M Akay; N Aslan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-06

4.  Compressive creep characteristics of extruded ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene.

Authors:  K Y Lee; D Pienkowski
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1998-02

5.  Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface.

Authors:  K Albert; R Schledjewski; M Harbaugh; S Bleser; R Jamison; K Friedrich
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.300

6.  In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts.

Authors:  C Morrison; R Macnair; C MacDonald; A Wykman; I Goldie; M H Grant
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part I: The composite trunnion/ceramic head interface.

Authors:  G Maharaj; S Bleser; K Albert; R Lambert; S Jani; R Jamison
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.300

8.  Long-term compressive property durability of carbon fibre-reinforced polyetheretherketone composite in physiological saline.

Authors:  G Zhang; R A Latour; J M Kennedy; H Del Schutte; R J Friedman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use.

Authors:  A Hunter; C W Archer; P S Walker; G W Blunn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  An estimation of fatigue life for a carbon fibre/poly ether ether ketone hip joint prosthesis.

Authors:  M Akay; N Aslan
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.617

View more
  13 in total

1.  Material failure in dynamic spine implants: are the standardized implant tests before market launch sufficient?

Authors:  Stavros Oikonomidis; Rolf Sobottke; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Herren; Agnes Beckmann; Kourosh Zarghooni; Jan Siewe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Do Surface Porosity and Pore Size Influence Mechanical Properties and Cellular Response to PEEK?

Authors:  F Brennan Torstrick; Nathan T Evans; Hazel Y Stevens; Ken Gall; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Deposition, Heat Treatment And Characterization of Two Layer Bioactive Coatings on Cylindrical PEEK.

Authors:  John W Durham; Afsaneh Rabiei
Journal:  Surf Coat Technol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.158

4.  Preparation, characterization and in vitro response of bioactive coatings on polyether ether ketone.

Authors:  John W Durham; Matthew J Allen; Afsaneh Rabiei
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.368

Review 5.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for medical applications.

Authors:  Ivan Vladislavov Panayotov; Valérie Orti; Frédéric Cuisinier; Jacques Yachouh
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Outcome of transtibial AperFix system in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  Gökay Görmeli; C Ayşe Görmeli; Mustafa Karakaplan; M Fatih Korkmaz; Uğur Diliçıkık; Harika Gözükara
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Flexible Stabilisation of the Degenerative Lumbar Spine Using PEEK Rods.

Authors:  Jacques Benezech; Bruno Garlenq; Gilles Larroque
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 9.  Spinal Compression Fracture Management: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies and Possible Future Avenues.

Authors:  Ivo K Genev; Matthew K Tobin; Saher P Zaidi; Sajeel R Khan; Farid M L Amirouche; Ankit I Mehta
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-02-01

10.  Clinical effects of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage system in the treatment of cervical spondylosis with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Yuluo Rong; Yongjun Luo; Wei Liu; Fangyi Gong; Pengyu Tang; Weihua Cai
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.