Literature DB >> 16736199

Evaluation of the 96/4 PLDLLA polymer resorbable lumbar interbody cage in a long term animal model.

Jean Y Lazennec1, Abdallah Madi, Marc A Rousseau, Bernard Roger, Gérard Saillant.   

Abstract

Arthrodesis using interbody cages has demonstrated high fusion rates. However, permanent cages are exposed to stress-shielding, corrosion, and may require explanation when necessary. Polylactic acid (PLA) bioresorbable cages are developed for avoiding these problems, but significant tissue reaction has been reported with 70/30 PLDLLA in some preclinical animal studies. The objective was to evaluate 96/4 PLDLLA cages in a sheep model over 3 years. Sixteen sheeps underwent one level anterior lumbar interbody fusion using 96/4 PLDLLA cages, filled and surrounded with cancellous bone graft from the iliac crest. Six groups of three animals were killed after 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, and 36 months. Harvested lumbar spine had radiographic, MRI, and CT evaluation and histological analysis. Histological results: cage swelling and slight signs of fragmentation associated to fibrocartilaginous tissue apposition at 3 months; bone remodeling around the cage with direct apposition of the mineralization front at 6 months; active cage degradation and complete fusion around the cage at 9 months; cage fragmentation and partial replacement by bone tissue at 12 months; bone bridges in and around the cage at 24 months; full resorption and intervertebral fusion at 36 months. Radiological results: partial arthrodesis at 3 months; definite peripheral arthrodesis at 6 months; similar aspect at 9 months; significant cage resorption at 12 months; definite inner and outer fusion at 24 months; complete cage resorption and calcification at the location of the cage at 36 months confirmed histological observations. Radiographic, CT scan, MRI, and histological data were consistent for showing progressive resorption of 96/4 PLDLLA, interbody fusion, and bone remodeling, with no significant signs of local intolerance reaction. These results are promising and suggest further development of 96/4 PLDLLA cages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736199     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0145-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  52 in total

Review 1.  Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base.

Authors:  A Weiler; R F Hoffmann; A C Stähelin; H J Helling; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages.

Authors:  P C McAfee; B W Cunningham; G A Lee; C M Orbegoso; C J Haggerty; I L Fedder; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Bioabsorbable interbody cages in a sheep cervical spine fusion model.

Authors:  Frank Kandziora; Robert Pflugmacher; Matti Scholz; Tanja Eindorf; Klaus J Schnake; Norbert P Haas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; C J Haggerty; K Abumi; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients.

Authors:  J W Brantigan; A D Steffee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Evaluation of 70/30 poly (L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide) for use as a resorbable interbody fusion cage.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Toth; Bradley T Estes; Mei Wang; Howard B Seim; Jeffrey L Scifert; A Simon Turner; G Bryan Cornwall
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 8.  Interbody cage devices.

Authors:  Thomas A Zdeblick; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Foreign-body reaction and the course of osteolysis after polyglycolide implants for fracture fixation: experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  A Weiler; H J Helling; U Kirch; T K Zirbes; K E Rehm
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-05

Review 10.  Applications of a resorbable interbody spacer via a posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique.

Authors:  Joseph T Alexander; Charles L Branch; Brian R Subach; Regis W Haid
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Osteolysis following resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D, L-lactide PLIF cage use: a review of cases.

Authors:  Andrew Frost; Elmanzour Bagouri; Mark Brown; Vinay Jasani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

3.  Resorbable Pins to Enhance Scaffold Retention in a Porcine Chondral Defect Model.

Authors:  Jay M Patel; Mackenzie L Sennett; Anthony R Martin; Kamiel S Saleh; Michael R Eby; Blair S Ashley; Liane M Miller; George R Dodge; Jason A Burdick; James L Carey; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of the PEEK cage and an autologous cage made from the lumbar spinous process and laminae in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Bin Lin; Hui Yu; Zhida Chen; Zhuanzhi Huang; Wenbin Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.