Literature DB >> 11923458

Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Päivi Helenius1, Riitta Salmelin, Elisabet Service, John F Connolly, Seija Leinonen, Heikki Lyytinen.   

Abstract

We used magnetoencephalography to elucidate the cortical activation associated with the segmentation of spoken words in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults. The subjects listened to binaurally presented sentences where the sentence-ending words were either semantically appropriate or inappropriate to the preceding sentence context. Half of the inappropriate final words shared two or three initial phonemes with the highly expected semantically appropriate words. Two temporally and functionally distinct response patterns were detected in the superior temporal lobe. The first response peaked at approximately 100 msec in the supratemporal plane and showed no sensitivity to the semantic appropriateness of the final word. This presemantic N100m response was abnormally strong in the left hemisphere of dyslexic individuals. After the N100m response, the semantically inappropriate sentence-ending words evoked stronger activation than the expected endings in the superior temporal cortex in the vicinity of the auditory cortex. This N400m response was delayed for words starting with the same two or three first few phonemes as the expected words but only until the first evidence of acoustic-phonetic dissimilarity emerged. This subtle delay supports the notion of initial lexical access being based on phonemes or acoustic features. In dyslexic participants, this qualitative aspect of word processing appeared to be normal. However, for all words alike, the ascending slope of the semantic activation in the left hemisphere was delayed by approximately 50 msec as compared with control subjects. The delay in the auditory N400m response in dyslexic subjects is likely to result from presemantic-phonological deficits possibly reflected in the abnormal N100m response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11923458      PMCID: PMC6758334          DOI: 20026244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  An event-related neuroimaging study distinguishing form and content in sentence processing.

Authors:  W Ni; R T Constable; W E Mencl; K R Pugh; R K Fulbright; S E Shaywitz; B A Shaywitz; J C Gore; D Shankweiler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults.

Authors:  M Ahissar; A Protopapas; M Reid; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cortical processing of change detection: dissociation between natural vowels and two-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  M Vihla; O V Lounasmaa; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cortical auditory signal processing in poor readers.

Authors:  S Nagarajan; H Mahncke; T Salz; P Tallal; T Roberts; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The anatomy of phonological and semantic processing in normal subjects.

Authors:  J F Démonet; F Chollet; S Ramsay; D Cardebat; J L Nespoulous; R Wise; A Rascol; R Frackowiak
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Event-related potential components reflect phonological and semantic processing of the terminal word of spoken sentences.

Authors:  J F Connolly; N A Phillips
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  The effects of phonological and semantic features of sentence-ending words on visual event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  J F Connolly; N A Phillips; K A Forbes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04

9.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components.

Authors:  M A Uusitalo; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features.

Authors:  W Marslen-Wilson; P Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  21 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing.

Authors:  Ksenija Marinkovic; Rupali P Dhond; Anders M Dale; Maureen Glessner; Valerie Carr; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Recognition of affective prosody in brain-damaged patients and healthy controls: a neurophysiological study using EEG and whole-head MEG.

Authors:  Boris Kotchoubey; Jochen Kaiser; Vladimir Bostanov; Werner Lutzenberger; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400m.

Authors:  Christian Dobel; Lothar Lagemann; Pienie Zwitserlood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Oral language deficits in familial dyslexia: A meta-analysis and review.

Authors:  Margaret J Snowling; Monica Melby-Lervåg
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Developmental evaluation of atypical auditory sampling in dyslexia: Functional and structural evidence.

Authors:  Mikel Lizarazu; Marie Lallier; Nicola Molinaro; Mathieu Bourguignon; Pedro M Paz-Alonso; Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The role of visual representations during the lexical access of spoken words.

Authors:  Gwyneth Lewis; David Poeppel
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Separating phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Ryan C N D'Arcy; John F Connolly; Elisabet Service; Colin S Hawco; Michael E Houlihan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Co-speech gestures influence neural activity in brain regions associated with processing semantic information.

Authors:  Anthony Steven Dick; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Uri Hasson; Jeremy I Skipper; Steven L Small
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.