Literature DB >> 10841578

Auditory processing parallels reading abilities in adults.

M Ahissar1, A Protopapas, M Reid, M M Merzenich.   

Abstract

A broad battery of psychoacoustic measures and standard measures of reading and spelling were applied to 102 adults. The test group included individuals with a childhood history of reading difficulties and controls with no reported reading difficulties. Reading scores were variable in both groups. Poor auditory processing abilities were recorded in poor readers; particular difficulties were posed by tasks requiring spectral distinctions, the simplest of which was pure tone frequency discrimination. In absolute terms, the greatest deficits were recorded in tasks in which stimuli were presented in brief forms and in rapid succession. Auditory processing abilities accounted for more than 50% of the reading score variance in the control group, but their correlation with reading scores was lower in the group with childhood histories of reading difficulties. The additional variability in the latter group resulted largely from the prevalence of reading-compensated poor psychoacoustic performers, whose short-term word memory was also typically poor. Taken together, these findings support a link between impaired auditory resolution and poor reading. Psychoacoustic difficulties are largely retained through adulthood and may be the source of the retained reading difficulties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10841578      PMCID: PMC18757          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.12.6832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

Review 1.  Dyslexia.

Authors:  S E Shaywitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Speech perception in children with specific reading difficulties (dyslexia).

Authors:  A Adlard; V Hazan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1998-02

3.  Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learning.

Authors:  M Ahissar; S Hochstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Defects of non-verbal auditory perception in children with developmental aphasia.

Authors:  P Tallal; M Piercy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Deficits in auditory temporal and spectral resolution in language-impaired children.

Authors:  B A Wright; L J Lombardino; W M King; C S Puranik; C M Leonard; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-05-08       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children.

Authors:  P Tallal
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Dynamic auditory localization by normal and learning disability children.

Authors:  J S Devens; E A Hoyer; R L McCroskey
Journal:  J Am Audiol Soc       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb

8.  Language learning impairment: integrating research and remediation.

Authors:  P Tallal; M Merzenich; S Miller; W Jenkins
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1998-09

9.  Role of auditory temporal processing for reading and spelling disability.

Authors:  G Schulte-Körne; W Deimel; J Bartling; H Remschmidt
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1998-06

10.  Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers.

Authors:  C Witton; J B Talcott; P C Hansen; A J Richardson; T D Griffiths; A Rees; J F Stein; G G Green
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  41 in total

1.  Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin; Elisabet Service; John F Connolly; Seija Leinonen; Heikki Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Temporal order and processing acuity of visual, auditory, and tactile perception in developmentally dyslexic young adults.

Authors:  M Laasonen; E Service; V Virsu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  From temporal processing to developmental language disorders: mind the gap.

Authors:  Athanassios Protopapas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Timing is everything: neural response dynamics during syllable processing and its relation to higher-order cognition in schizophrenia and healthy comparison subjects.

Authors:  Corby L Dale; Anne M Findlay; R Alison Adcock; Mary Vertinski; Melissa Fisher; Alexander Genevsky; Stephanie Aldebot; Karuna Subramaniam; Tracy L Luks; Gregory V Simpson; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  An acoustic startle-based method of assessing frequency discrimination in mice.

Authors:  Amanda Clause; Tuan Nguyen; Karl Kandler
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  The dyslexia-associated gene DCDC2 is required for spike-timing precision in mouse neocortex.

Authors:  Alicia Che; Matthew J Girgenti; Joseph LoTurco
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Psychophysical indices of perceptual functioning in dyslexia: A psychometric analysis.

Authors:  Steve M Heath; Dorothy V M Bishop; John H Hogben; Neil W Roach
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; W Lee; K Lawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.