Literature DB >> 7984710

Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes, and features.

W Marslen-Wilson1, P Warren.   

Abstract

Three experiments and a simulation study investigate competing featural and phonemic views of the representation of the speech input in access to the mental lexicon. Auditory lexical decision and gating tasks show that the processing consequences of subcategorical mismatches (conflicts between phonetic cues to speech segment identity) depend on the lexical status of the conflicting cues, such that conflicts that only involve nonwords do not disrupt performance. A further study, using a phonetic-decision task with the same stimuli, found the same pattern. A simulation study shows that the interactive activation model TRACE, with top-down feedback to a prelexical phonemic level, does not model these effects successfully. The authors argue instead for a direct access featural model, based on a distributed computational substrate, where featural information is mapped directly onto lexical representations.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7984710     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  48 in total

1.  Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J S Magnuson; D Dahan; C Chambers
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

2.  Cortical activation during spoken-word segmentation in nonreading-impaired and dyslexic adults.

Authors:  Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin; Elisabet Service; John F Connolly; Seija Leinonen; Heikki Lyytinen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Influence of onset density on spoken-word recognition.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: cross-linguistic comparisons.

Authors:  A Cutler; N Sebastián-Gallés; O Soler-Vilageliu; B van Ooijen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

5.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice.

Authors:  Lynne C Nygaard; Erin R Lunders
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

6.  Atypical neural responses to phonological detail in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Eye movements reveal fast, voice-specific priming.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-01-04

8.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception?

Authors:  James L McClelland; Daniel Mirman; Lori L Holt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: implications for event-related potential research.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.