INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Polypropylene meshes are frequently used in abdominal and vaginal reconstructive surgery. Recently, several authors have claimed that mesh-associated complications may be linked to mesh shrinkage. We have performed a prospective study with postoperative follow-up by ultrasound examination at two time points after Prolift anterior implantation to assess changes in the ultrasound appearance of mesh implants over time. METHODS: We assessed 36 patients who had undergone mesh implantation with Prolift anterior mesh for the correction of symptomatic anterior vaginal wall prolapse. During the surgery, we measured the actual midline length of the mesh (initial length). On the fourth postoperative day, we performed a vaginal ultrasound examination (US) to measure mesh length in the midsagittal plane. A second US was performed 3-5 months after surgery to repeat this measurement. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in mesh length determined before and 4 days after surgery (90.3 vs. 57.1 mm, P = <0.0001) indicating intraoperative folding. On comparing early and late postoperative ultrasound measurements, there was a reduction in length from 57.1 to 48.3 mm (P < 0.0001), indicating possible shrinkage or retraction. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative folding seems to be responsible for a large part of the difference between preoperative (in vitro) and postoperative (US) measurements of mesh dimensions, suggesting that surgical techniques may require adjustment.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Polypropylene meshes are frequently used in abdominal and vaginal reconstructive surgery. Recently, several authors have claimed that mesh-associated complications may be linked to mesh shrinkage. We have performed a prospective study with postoperative follow-up by ultrasound examination at two time points after Prolift anterior implantation to assess changes in the ultrasound appearance of mesh implants over time. METHODS: We assessed 36 patients who had undergone mesh implantation with Prolift anterior mesh for the correction of symptomatic anterior vaginal wall prolapse. During the surgery, we measured the actual midline length of the mesh (initial length). On the fourth postoperative day, we performed a vaginal ultrasound examination (US) to measure mesh length in the midsagittal plane. A second US was performed 3-5 months after surgery to repeat this measurement. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in mesh length determined before and 4 days after surgery (90.3 vs. 57.1 mm, P = <0.0001) indicating intraoperative folding. On comparing early and late postoperative ultrasound measurements, there was a reduction in length from 57.1 to 48.3 mm (P < 0.0001), indicating possible shrinkage or retraction. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative folding seems to be responsible for a large part of the difference between preoperative (in vitro) and postoperative (US) measurements of mesh dimensions, suggesting that surgical techniques may require adjustment.
Authors: Maja L Konstantinovic; Eline Pille; Marta Malinowska; Eric Verbeken; Dirk De Ridder; Jan Deprest Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2006-10-10
Authors: William S Cobb; Justin M Burns; Richard D Peindl; Alfredo M Carbonell; Brent D Matthews; Kent W Kercher; B Todd Heniford Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2006-09-22 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: P Debodinance; J Berrocal; H Clavé; M Cosson; O Garbin; B Jacquetin; C Rosenthal; D Salet-Lizée; R Villet Journal: J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) Date: 2004-11
Authors: Tanja Fischer; Roland Ladurner; Alexander Gangkofer; Thomas Mussack; Maximilian Reiser; Andreas Lienemann Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-06-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: K Baeßler; T Aigmüller; S Albrich; C Anthuber; D Finas; T Fink; C Fünfgeld; B Gabriel; U Henscher; F H Hetzer; M Hübner; B Junginger; K Jundt; S Kropshofer; A Kuhn; L Logé; G Nauman; U Peschers; T Pfiffer; O Schwandner; A Strauss; R Tunn; V Viereck Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: William R Barone; Rouzbeh Amini; Spandan Maiti; Pamela A Moalli; Steven D Abramowitch Journal: J Biomech Date: 2015-03-16 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Nikhil Sindhwani; Andrew Feola; Frederik De Keyzer; Filip Claus; Geertje Callewaert; Iva Urbankova; Sebastien Ourselin; Jan D'hooge; Jan Deprest Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Masayuki Endo; Andrew Feola; Nikhil Sindhwani; Stefano Manodoro; Jarek Vlacil; Alexander Carl Engels; Filip Claus; Jan A Deprest Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Alexis L Nolfi; Bryan N Brown; Rui Liang; Stacy L Palcsey; Michael J Bonidie; Steven D Abramowitch; Pamela A Moalli Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 8.661