Literature DB >> 11918230

Gender differences in the genetic factors responsible for variation in bone density and ultrasound.

Vasi Naganathan1, Alex Macgregor, Harold Snieder, Tuan Nguyen, Tim Spector, Philip Sambrook.   

Abstract

Although genetic factors are thought to explain a large proportion of the variation in bone density in women, few studies have been conducted in men. Therefore, it is unclear whether the individual differences in bone strength between men and women are a reflection of gender differences in the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors on bone density variance. The aim of this study was to determine if there were gender differences in the genetic components of variance for bone density and ultrasound. In addition, the study aimed to explore the hypothesis that there are unique gender-specific genetic determinants of these traits. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip, distal forearm, and lumbar spine were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as well as quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the calcaneus in healthy female twin pairs (286 identical [MZ] and 265 nonidentical [DZ]), male twin pairs (72 MZ and 65 DZ), and 82 opposite-sex (OS) pairs aged between 18 and 80 years. For hip BMD, distal forearm, and QUS measurements, the differences between MZ correlations and like-sex DZ correlations were similar for both sexes, suggesting little difference in the component of total variance explained by genetic factors between male and female twin pairs. However, correlations between OS twin pairs were lower than that of like-sex twin pairs, suggesting the possibility of unique gender-specific genetic effects. At the forearm, model fitting suggested a small gender difference in the magnitude of genetic variance as well as the presence of a unique gender-specific genetic variance component. Hip, lumbar spine, and QUS measurements were better explained by models that assumed no gender differences in genetic variance between the sexes, but the study had insufficient power to detect small differences in the genetic components of variance. The results of this study suggest that the proportion of bone strength variance explained by genetic factors is similar for men and women. However, at some regions there is evidence to suggest a gender-specific genetic component to the overall genetic variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11918230     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.4.725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  19 in total

1.  Vitamin D receptor variability and physical activity are jointly associated with low handgrip strength and osteoporosis in community-dwelling elderly people in Taiwan: the Taichung Community Health Study for Elders (TCHS-E).

Authors:  F-Y Wu; C-S Liu; L-N Liao; C-I Li; C-H Lin; C-W Yang; N-H Meng; W-Y Lin; C-K Chang; J-H Hsiao; T-C Li; C-C Lin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Huilin Jin; Stuart H Ralston
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Meta-analysis of genome-wide linkage studies for bone mineral density.

Authors:  Young Ho Lee; Young Hee Rho; Seong Jae Choi; Jong Dae Ji; Gwan Gyu Song
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 4.  Prevalence of low bone mineral density in female dancers.

Authors:  Tânia Amorim; Matthew Wyon; José Maia; José Carlos Machado; Franklim Marques; George S Metsios; Andreas D Flouris; Yiannis Koutedakis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Genetic influence on bone mineral density in Korean twins and families: the healthy twin study.

Authors:  J-H Park; Y-M Song; J Sung; K Lee; Y S Kim; Y S Park
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins.

Authors:  Vasi Naganathan; Philip Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Fracture prevention in men.

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Philip Sambrook; Willem Lems
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.543

9.  Genetic influence on bone phenotypes and body composition: a Swedish twin study.

Authors:  Helene Wagner; Håkan Melhus; Nancy L Pedersen; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  No association of the polymorphisms of the frizzled-related protein gene with peak bone mineral density in Chinese nuclear families.

Authors:  Gao Gao; Zhen-Lin Zhang; Jin-Wei He; Hao Zhang; Hua Yue; Wei-Wei Hu; Jie-Mei Gu; Wen-Zhen Fu; Yun-Qiu Hu; Miao Li; Yu-Juan Liu; Jin-Bo Yu
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.