Literature DB >> 21656262

Genetic influence on bone mineral density in Korean twins and families: the healthy twin study.

J-H Park1, Y-M Song, J Sung, K Lee, Y S Kim, Y S Park.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Bone mineral density (BMD), a representative marker of osteoporosis risk, is found to be highly heritable in this Korean study, which is very consistent with the findings in Western populations. This finding strongly supports that genetic factors are significant determinants of osteoporosis risk along with individual biological and behavioral factors.
INTRODUCTION: Although genetic factors are known to contribute significantly to variations in BMD in Western populations, such an association has not been fully evaluated in an Asian population. This study was conducted to determine the role of genetic factors on BMD in Korean population.
METHODS: The study participants were 2,728 men and women consisting of 497 monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs, 119 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs, and 1,496 first-degree relatives from the Healthy Twin Study. BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Quantitative genetic analysis based on a variance decomposition model was performed.
RESULTS: Age and the measured covariates accounted for 17~61% of the variation in BMD, depending on the sites of measurement. After accounting for the covariate effects, the heritability of BMD at the whole body, thoracic and lumbar spine, whole ribs, whole pelvis, whole arms, and whole legs were 0.76, 0.72, 0.73, 0.71, 0.51, and 0.75, respectively. The pair-wise correlation of BMD was the highest within MZ twin pairs, followed by DZ twin pairs, sibling pairs, and parents-child pairs. Cross-trait correlation analysis revealed a positive genetic correlation between BMDs at different sites, ranging from 0.80 (arm and leg BMD) to 0.50 (pelvis and arm BMD).
CONCLUSIONS: The high heritability of BMD in this Korean population similar to those found in Western populations and the significant common genetic basis between BMDs at different sites strongly supports a significant role of genetic determinants on the risk of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21656262     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1685-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

1.  Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea--protocols and current status.

Authors:  Joohon Sung; Sung-Il Cho; Kayoung Lee; Mina Ha; Eun-Young Choi; Ji-Sook Choi; Ho Kim; Jihae Kim; Kyoung Sue Hong; Yeonju Kim; Keun-Young Yoo; Chan Park; Yun-Mi Song
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.587

2.  Large-scale genome-wide linkage analysis for loci linked to BMD at different skeletal sites in extreme selected sibships.

Authors:  Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Xin Xu; Henry A Terwedow; Tianhua Niu; Xuimei Hong; Di Wu; Lihua Wang; Joseph D Brain; Mary L Bouxsein; Steve R Cummings; Cliff J Rosen; Xiping Xu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: a reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; J C Christian; C J Williams; J A Norton; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Bone mass in childhood is related to maternal diet in pregnancy.

Authors:  J H Tobias; C D Steer; P M Emmett; R J Tonkin; C Cooper; A R Ness
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Determination of bone mineral density of the hip and spine in human pedigrees by genetic and life-style factors.

Authors:  H W Deng; W M Chen; T Conway; Y Zhou; K M Davies; M R Stegman; H Deng; R R Recker
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Environmental and genetic factors affecting bone mass. Similarity of bone density among members of healthy families.

Authors:  P Jouanny; F Guillemin; C Kuntz; C Jeandel; J Pourel
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-01

8.  Assessment of sex-specific genetic and environmental effects on bone mineral density.

Authors:  Lillian B Brown; Elizabeth A Streeten; Alan R Shuldiner; Laura A Almasy; Patricia A Peyser; Braxton D Mitchell
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 9.  Ethnic and genetic differences in bone mass: a review with a hereditary vs environmental perspective.

Authors:  W S Pollitzer; J J Anderson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Genetic and environmental determinants of bone mineral density in Mexican Americans: results from the San Antonio Family Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Braxton D Mitchell; Candace M Kammerer; Jennifer L Schneider; Reina Perez; Richard L Bauer
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cortical bone health shows significant linkage to chromosomes 2p, 3p, and 17q in 10-year-old children.

Authors:  Dana L Duren; John Blangero; Richard J Sherwood; Maja Seselj; Thomas Dyer; Shelley A Cole; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Roger M Siervogel; Stefan A Czerwinski; Bradford Towne
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Gene-dietary fat interaction, bone mineral density and bone speed of sound in children: a twin study in China.

Authors:  Tao Huang; Huijuan Liu; Wei Zhao; Ji Li; Youfa Wang
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.914

3.  Genetic influence on the association between bone mineral density and testosterone in Korean men.

Authors:  J Shin; J Sung; K Lee; Y-M Song
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Social determinants of smoking behavior: the Healthy Twin Study, Korea.

Authors:  Youn Sik Kim; Hansoo Ko; Changgyo Yoon; Dong-Hun Lee; Joohon Sung
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-01-31

Review 5.  [Factors that influence bone mass of healthy children and adolescents measured by quantitative ultrasound at the hand phalanges: a systematic review].

Authors:  Tathyane Krahenbühl; Ezequiel Moreira Gonçalves; Eduardo Tavares Costa; Antonio de Azevedo Barros Filho
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-03

6.  Evaluation of WISP1 as a candidate gene for bone mineral density in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Shabnam Salimi; Zhongliang Deng; James Perry; Kathleen A Ryan; Zhizhen Li; Dongfang Liu; Elizabeth Streeten; Alan R Shuldiner; Mao Fu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The relationship between thoracic kyphosis and age, and normative values across age groups: a systematic review of healthy adults.

Authors:  Mattia Zappalá; Stephen Lightbourne; Nicola R Heneghan
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Genetic association study identified a 20 kb regulatory element in WLS associated with osteoporosis and bone mineral density in Han Chinese.

Authors:  Dangfeng Zhang; Zhaohui Ge; Xin Ma; Liqiang Zhi; Yunzhi Zhang; Xueyuan Wu; Shuxin Yao; Wei Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparing proton pump inhibitors with histamin-2 receptor blockers regarding the risk of osteoporotic fractures: a nested case-control study of more than 350,000 Korean patients with GERD and peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Park; Jessie Lee; Su-Yeon Yu; Jin-Hyung Jung; Kyungdo Han; Do-Hoon Kim; Jinnie Rhee
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.