Literature DB >> 11914218

A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry.

J Santodomingo-Rubido1, E A H Mallen, B Gilmartin, J S Wolffsohn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new commercially available device (IOLMaster, Zeiss Instruments) provides high resolution non-contact measurements of axial length (using partial coherent interferometry), anterior chamber depth, and corneal radius (using image analysis). The study evaluates the validity and repeatability of these measurements and compares the findings with those obtained from instrumentation currently used in clinical practice.
METHOD: Measurements were taken on 52 subjects (104 eyes) aged 18-40 years with a range of mean spherical refractive error from +7.0 D to -9.50 D. IOLMaster measurements of anterior chamber depth and axial length were compared with A-scan applanation ultrasonography (Storz Omega) and those for corneal radius with a Javal-Schiötz keratometer (Topcon) and an EyeSys corneal videokeratoscope.
RESULTS: Axial length: the difference between IOLMaster and ultrasound measures was insignificant (0.02 (SD 0.32) mm, p = 0.47) with no bias across the range sampled (22.40-27.99 mm). Anterior chamber depth: significantly shorter depths than ultrasound were found with the IOLMaster (-0.06 (0.25) mm, p <0.02) with no bias across the range sampled (2.85-4.40 mm). Corneal radius: IOLMaster measurements matched more closely those of the keratometer than those of the videokeratoscope (mean difference -0.03 v -0.06 mm respectively), but were more variable (95% confidence 0.13 v 0.07 mm). The repeatability of all the above IOLMaster biometric measures was found to be of a high order with no significant bias across the measurement ranges sampled.
CONCLUSIONS: The validity and repeatability of measurements provided by the IOLMaster will augment future studies in ocular biometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11914218      PMCID: PMC1771084          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.4.458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  31 in total

1.  Correction of optic disc measurements on fundus photographs.

Authors:  B Bengtsson; C E Krakau
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements.

Authors:  J M Butcher; C O'Brien
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Evaluation of the EyeSys model II computerized videokeratoscope. Part II: The repeatability and accuracy in measuring convex aspheric surfaces.

Authors:  T Dave; D Ruston; C Fowler
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Assessment of toroidal surfaces by the measurement of curvature in three fixed meridians.

Authors:  C W Fowler
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Measurements of peripapillary nerve fiber layer contour in glaucoma.

Authors:  J Caprioli; R Ortiz-Colberg; J M Miller; C Tressler
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open-angle glaucoma. II. Correlation of the intrapapillary morphometric data to visual field indices.

Authors:  J B Jonas; G C Gusek; G O Naumann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Peripheral refraction and ocular shape in children.

Authors:  D O Mutti; R I Sholtz; N E Friedman; K Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  High axial length/corneal radius ratio as a risk factor in the development of myopia.

Authors:  T Grosvenor
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1988-09

10.  Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis.

Authors:  W Haigis; B Lege; N Miller; B Schneider
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.117

View more
  45 in total

1.  Comparison of biometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image-Guided System versus the auto-refracto-keratometer.

Authors:  Cecilio Velasco-Barona; Guadalupe Cervantes-Coste; Erick Mendoza-Schuster; Claudia Corredor-Ortega; Nadia L Casillas-Chavarín; Alejandro Silva-Moreno; Manuel Garza-León; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Assessment of eye length changes in accommodation using dynamic extended-depth OCT.

Authors:  Yu-Cherng Chang; Keke Liu; Carolina de Freitas; Alex Pham; Florence Cabot; Siobhan Williams; Ethan Adre; Giovanni Gregori; Marco Ruggeri; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Authors:  Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Sara Bigdeli; Ashkan Shahnazi; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Errors associated with IOLMaster biometry as a function of internal ocular dimensions.

Authors:  Miguel Faria-Ribeiro; Daniela Lopes-Ferreira; Norberto López-Gil; Jorge Jorge; José Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-01-28

5.  Comparison of ocular parameters of two biometric measurement devices in highly myopic eyes.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Guo; Ran You; Shan-Shan Li; Xiu-Fen Yang; Lu Zhao; Fan Zhang; Yan-Ling Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Comparison of immersion ultrasound and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients.

Authors:  Yan Li; Hong-Xun Li; Yang-Chen Liu; Ya-Tu Guo; Jian-Min Gao; Bin Wu; Nan Zhang; Dong Liu; Xiao-Yong Yuan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Ocular higher-order aberrations and mesopic pupil size in individuals screened for refractive surgery.

Authors:  Seyed Javad Hashemian; Mohammad Soleimani; Alireza Foroutan; Mahmood Joshaghani; Mohammad Jafar Ghaempanah; Mohammad Ebrahim Jafari; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Comparison of anterior chamber depth measurements using the IOLMaster, scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyser, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Raghavan Lavanya; Livia Teo; David S Friedman; Han T Aung; Mani Baskaran; Hong Gao; Tamuno Alfred; Steve K Seah; Kenji Kashiwagi; Paul J Foster; Tin Aung
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Repeatability of on- and off-axis eye length measurements using the lenstar.

Authors:  Krystal L Schulle; David A Berntsen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  [Measurement of accommodation using optical biometry].

Authors:  A Nurispahic; K Kotliar; I Lanzl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.