Literature DB >> 11045345

Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis.

W Haigis1, B Lege, N Miller, B Schneider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The precision of intraocular lens (IOL) calculation is essentially determined by the accuracy of the measurement of axial length. In addition to classical ultrasound biometry, partial coherence interferometry serves as a new optical method for axial length determination. A functional prototype from Carl Zeiss Jena implementing this principle was compared with immersion ultrasound biometry in our laboratory. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 108 patients attending the biometry laboratory for planning of cataract surgery, axial lengths were additionally measured optically. Whereas surgical decisions were based on ultrasound data, we used postoperative refraction measurements to calculate retrospectively what results would have been obtained if optical axial length data had been used for IOL calculation. For the translation of optical to geometrical lengths, five different conversion formulas were used, among them the relation which is built into the Zeiss IOL-Master. IOL calculation was carried out according to Haigis with and without optimization of constants.
RESULTS: On the basis of ultrasound immersion data from our Grieshaber Biometric System (GBS), postoperative refraction after implantation of a Rayner IOL type 755 U was predicted correctly within +/- 1 D in 85.7% and within +/- 2 D in 99% of all cases. An analogous result was achieved with optical axial length data after suitable transformation of optical path lengths into geometrical distances.
CONCLUSIONS: Partial coherence interferometry is a noncontact, user- and patient-friendly method for axial length determination and IOL planning with an accuracy comparable to that of high-precision immersion ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045345     DOI: 10.1007/s004170000188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  110 in total

1.  [Effect of applanation tonometry on precision of biometry measurements].

Authors:  T M Rabsilber; S Bueltmann; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Misleading axial length measurements with the IOLMaster due to a dense posterior vitreous surface membrane and a macular edema in a diabetic patient.

Authors:  Christoph Fidel Mayer; Navid Ardjomand; Werner Wackernagel; Michaela Velikay-Parel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of formulas and methods for high myopia patients requiring intraocular lens powers less than six diopters.

Authors:  Harry S Geggel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation methods in eyes that have undergone laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Li Wang; Marc A Booth; Douglas D Koch
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

7.  Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Authors:  S Jasvinder; T F Khang; K K S Sarinder; V P Loo; V Subrayan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Wide-field whole eye OCT system with demonstration of quantitative retinal curvature estimation.

Authors:  Ryan P McNabb; James Polans; Brenton Keller; Moseph Jackson-Atogi; Charlene L James; Robin R Vann; Joseph A Izatt; Anthony N Kuo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  [Potentials and limitations of the planned compulsory quality assurance program for cataract surgery (Qesü)].

Authors:  U Hahn; B Bertram; F Krummenauer; A Reuscher; E Fabian; T Neuhann; S Schmickler; I Neuhann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 10.  Cataract surgery with implantation of an artificial lens.

Authors:  Thomas Kohnen; Martin Baumeister; Daniel Kook; Oliver K Klaproth; Christian Ohrloff
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.