Literature DB >> 11913811

Temporal modulation transfer functions in the barn owl (Tyto alba).

Michael L Dent1, Georg M Klump, Christian Schwenzfeier.   

Abstract

Barn owls (Tyto alba) have evolved several specializations in their auditory system to achieve the high sensory acuity required for prey capture, including superior processing of interaural time differences and phase coding in the auditory periphery. Here, we tested whether barn owls are capable of high temporal resolution that may be a prerequisite for the accuracy in binaural processing. Temporal resolution was measured psychoacoustically and demonstrated in temporal modulation transfer functions. Four barn owls were trained in an operant task with food reward to detect sinusoidal amplitude modulations within an 800-ms gated white-noise burst or 800-ms periods of modulation in continuous white noise (spectrum levels of -5 dB and 15 dB SPL). Within the range of tested amplitude modulation frequencies from 5 Hz to 1280 Hz, barn owls' detection thresholds were lowest at 10-20 Hz. This sensitivity corresponds to an intensity-difference limen of between 0.9 dB and 1.4 dB. For all conditions, temporal modulation transfer functions showed band-pass characteristics with a high-frequency cutoff in the range of 37 Hz to 92 Hz, corresponding to minimum integration times of 4.3 ms and 1.7 ms, respectively. In summary, these data indicate a temporal resolution in the owl's auditory system that is good, but not unusual, compared to other vertebrates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11913811     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-001-0259-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  14 in total

1.  Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  E Schneider; R M Hennig
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Analysis of spectral shape in the barn owl auditory system.

Authors:  U Langemann; M A Zokoll; G M Klump
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Amplitude modulation transfer functions reveal opposing populations within both the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Laurel Carney; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Amplitude modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency and stimulus duration: comparisons between macaques and humans.

Authors:  Kevin N O'Connor; Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Nigel C Noriega; Elizabeth A Marshall; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Detection thresholds for amplitude modulations of tones in budgerigar, rabbit, and human.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney; Angela D Ketterer; Kristina S Abrams; Douglas M Schwarz; Fabio Idrobo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

7.  Comodulation masking release determined in the mouse (Mus musculus) using a flanking-band paradigm.

Authors:  Karin B Klink; Holger Dierker; Rainer Beutelmann; Georg M Klump
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-10

8.  Functional groups in the avian auditory system.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Thane Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The role of envelope shape in the localization of multiple sound sources and echoes in the barn owl.

Authors:  Caitlin S Baxter; Brian S Nelson; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Neural correlates of behavioral amplitude modulation sensitivity in the budgerigar midbrain.

Authors:  Kenneth S Henry; Erikson G Neilans; Kristina S Abrams; Fabio Idrobo; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.