Literature DB >> 11912402

Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies?

Selahittin Cayan1, Fikret Erdemir, Isa Ozbey, Paul J Turek, Ateş Kadioğlu, Sedat Tellaloğlu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed how varicocelectomy alters semen quality in a large cohort of infertile men and determined whether it can change patient candidacy for assisted reproductive technology procedures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 540 infertile men with clinical palpable varicocele underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy and were followed more than 1 and 2 years postoperatively for alterations in semen quality and conception, respectively. Preoperatively and postoperatively the total motile sperm count was calculated in all semen analyses. Based on total motile sperm count values patients were divided into 4 groups according to the type of assisted reproductive technology for which they qualified, including 0 to 1.5 million or less (intracytoplasmic sperm injection candidates), 1.5 to 5 million or less (in vitro fertilization candidates), 5 to less than 20 million (intrauterine insemination candidates) and 20 million or greater sperm (spontaneous pregnancy candidates). Preoperative and postoperative semen quality was compared among individuals in these cohorts to determine the shifts in assisted reproductive technology care that are possible after varicolectomy.
RESULTS: Mean patient age was 29.5 years (range 18 to 58). Microsurgical varicocelectomy was bilateral in 393 patients (73%), on the left side in 146 (27%) and on the right side in 1 (0.2%). A positive response to varicocelectomy, defined as a greater than 50% increase in total motile sperm count, was observed in 271 patients (50%). An overall spontaneous pregnancy rate of 36.6% was achieved after varicocelectomy with a mean time to conception of 7 months (range 1 to 19). Of preoperative in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection candidates 31% became intrauterine insemination or spontaneous pregnancy candidates after varicolectomy. Of intrauterine insemination candidates 42% gained the potential for spontaneous pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Varicocelectomy has significant potential not only to obviate the need for assisted reproductive technology, but also to down stage or shift the level of assisted reproductive technology needed to bypass male factor infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11912402     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65192-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  29 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  Varicocele and infertility.

Authors:  G Forti; C Krausz; A Cilotti; M Maggi
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Minilaparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of testicular artery and lymphatic vessels by using intracorporeal knot-tying technique: five-year experience.

Authors:  Shiu-Dong Chung; Chia-Chang Wu; Victor Chia-Hsiang Lin; Chen-Hsun Ho; Stephen Shei Dei Yang; Yao-Chou Tsai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Reproducibility and reliability of semen analysis in youths at risk for infertility.

Authors:  Matthew S Christman; Kate H Kraft; Gregory E Tasian; Stephen A Zderic; Thomas F Kolon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Treating varicocele in 2018: current knowledge and treatment options.

Authors:  M Zavattaro; C Ceruti; G Motta; S Allasia; L Marinelli; C Di Bisceglie; M P Tagliabue; M Sibona; L Rolle; F Lanfranco
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen; Fatih Özkaya; Ahmet Emre Cinislioğlu; Mehmet Sefa Altay; Şenol Adanur; Özkan Polat; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

7.  The natural history of semen parameters in untreated asymptomatic adolescent varicocele patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  David I Chu; Stephen A Zderic; Aseem R Shukla; Arun K Srinivasan; Gregory E Tasian; Dana A Weiss; Christopher J Long; Douglas A Canning; Thomas F Kolon
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Predictors of improvement in semen parameters after varicocelectomy for male subfertility: A prospective study.

Authors:  Waleed Shabana; Mohamed Teleb; Tamer Dawod; Ehab Elsayed; Esam Desoky; Ashraf Shahin; Mahmoud Eladl; Waleed Sorour
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Does varicocelectomy improve semen analysis outcomes in adolescents without testicular asymmetry?

Authors:  David I Chu; Stephen A Zderic; Aseem R Shukla; Arun K Srinivasan; Gregory E Tasian; Dana A Weiss; Christopher J Long; Douglas A Canning; Thomas F Kolon
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.830

10.  An Infertile Couple's Long and Expensive Path to Varicocele Repair.

Authors:  Adithya Balasubramanian; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Jason M Scovell; Jonathan Lo; Byung Ji; Elizabeth L Godfrey; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.