Literature DB >> 23434946

Reproducibility and reliability of semen analysis in youths at risk for infertility.

Matthew S Christman1, Kate H Kraft, Gregory E Tasian, Stephen A Zderic, Thomas F Kolon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are few normative data on semen analyses in youths at risk for but not presenting with infertility. Standard practice among infertility specialists includes evaluation of 2 separate semen samples, given the degree of within subject variability. We hypothesized that males transitioning from pediatric to adult care who are at risk for infertility would similarly have this variability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with a history of cryptorchidism or varicocele who submitted 2 semen samples for evaluation of fertility potential. The within subject coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated for each semen parameter to evaluate reproducibility and reliability, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 79 subjects were studied. Mean ± SD age was 18.8 ± 1.2 years (range 17.8 to 24.7). The within subject coefficient of variation was high for each semen parameter, ranging from 36% for volume and motility to 82% for total motile count. Intraclass correlation coefficient for a single semen analysis ranged from 0.55 for motility to 0.88 for total count. Intraclass correlation coefficient for total motile count was 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.85), consistent with substantial reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: Although we observed within patient variability of individual semen analysis parameters, overall there was substantial agreement between consecutive semen analyses in this population at risk for infertility, particularly regarding total motile count, which is the most important determinant of fertility from a semen analysis. Therefore, it is possible to appropriately classify some young men based on the result of a single measurement as they transition from pediatric to adult care.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CV(w); ICC; SA; TMC; adolescent; intraclass correlation coefficient; reproducibility of results; semen analysis; total motile count; within subject coefficient of variation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23434946      PMCID: PMC3712861          DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  20 in total

1.  Variation in semen parameters derived from computer-aided semen analysis, within donors and between donors.

Authors:  J G Wijchman; B T de Wolf; R Graafe; E G Arts
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Use of coefficient of variation in assessing variability of quantitative assays.

Authors:  George F Reed; Freyja Lynn; Bruce D Meade
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2002-11

3.  Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects.

Authors:  C Alvarez; J A Castilla; L Martínez; J P Ramírez; F Vergara; J J Gaforio
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  How reliable are results from the semen analysis?

Authors:  Brooks A Keel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Reproducibility and reliability of repeated semen analyses in male partners of subfertile couples.

Authors:  Esther Leushuis; Jan Willem van der Steeg; Pieternel Steures; Sjoerd Repping; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Marinus A Blankenstein; Ben Willem J Mol; Fulco van der Veen; Peter G A Hompes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Experience with 425 subfertile male patients.

Authors:  S H Greenberg; L I Lipshultz; A J Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Stability of basic semen measures and abnormal morphology within individuals.

Authors:  M L Poland; K S Moghissi; P T Giblin; J W Ager; J M Olson
Journal:  J Androl       Date:  1986 Jul-Aug

8.  Within-subject variability of human semen in regard to sperm count, volume, total number of spermatozoa and length of abstinence.

Authors:  D Schwartz; A Laplanche; P Jouannet; G David
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1979-11

9.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Variation of semen measures within normal men.

Authors:  M L Poland; K S Moghissi; P T Giblin; J W Ager; J M Olson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  3 in total

1.  The natural history of semen parameters in untreated asymptomatic adolescent varicocele patients: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  David I Chu; Stephen A Zderic; Aseem R Shukla; Arun K Srinivasan; Gregory E Tasian; Dana A Weiss; Christopher J Long; Douglas A Canning; Thomas F Kolon
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.830

Review 2.  Transitional Urology for Male Adolescents: What Adult Urologists Should Know.

Authors:  Kristina D Suson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  The diagnosis of male infertility: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance-challenges and future research opportunities.

Authors:  Christopher L R Barratt; Lars Björndahl; Christopher J De Jonge; Dolores J Lamb; Francisco Osorio Martini; Robert McLachlan; Robert D Oates; Sheryl van der Poel; Bianca St John; Mark Sigman; Rebecca Sokol; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 15.610

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.