Literature DB >> 31291187

A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Şaban Oğuz Demirdöğen1, Fatih Özkaya2, Ahmet Emre Cinislioğlu2, Mehmet Sefa Altay2, Şenol Adanur2, Özkan Polat2, İsa Özbey2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare microscopic inguinal (MIV) and subinguinal varicocelectomy (MSV) surgeries with respect to efficacy and safety.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who underwent varicocelectomy between January 2002 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively and prospectively. The patients who underwent varicocelectomy until December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively and the cases after January 2016 were analyzed prospectively. In our study, the married infertile male cases were compared on the basis of operation duration, number of ligated veins, number of preserved veins, postoperative pain score (visual analogue scale: VAS), patient satisfaction, surgeon satisfaction, changes in sperm parameters, testicular consistency, pregnancy rates, and complications, such as hydrocele, testicular atrophy, and recurrence of varicocele. Surgical success rates were compared by semen analysis between unmarried infertile male cases because pregnancy rates cannot be tested. The patients were recalled for control examinations every 3 months for 1 year and tested the above-mentioned parameters. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 20 Windows Software was used for data analysis and comparison between the two groups.
RESULTS: The study included a total of 136 adult patients. Mean age of the patients was 28.14 (20-41) years. MSV and MIV were performed in 62 (45.6%) and 74 (54.4%) patients, respectively. No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups in terms of admission duration, semen parameters within the 1-year follow-up process, hormonal changes, and complication rates. Operation duration was significantly longer in the MSV group. It was determined that a fewer number of veins were ligated, and a fewer number of veins needed to be ligated in the MIV group. The analysis of all the patients revealed that pain scores at 4 and 24 hours postoperatively were significantly statistically lower in the MSV group.
CONCLUSION: MIV and MSV are distinct, efficient, and safe surgical techniques with specific advantages and disadvantages. Their efficacy and safety rates are similar.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31291187      PMCID: PMC6619852          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.72547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of results and complications of high ligation surgery and microsurgical high inguinal varicocelectomy in the treatment of varicocele.

Authors:  S Cayan; T C Kadioglu; A Tefekli; A Kadioglu; S Tellaloglu
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study.

Authors:  E M Beck; P N Schlegel; M Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Left varicocele due to reflux; experience with 4,470 operative cases in forty-two years.

Authors:  O IVANISSEVICH
Journal:  J Int Coll Surg       Date:  1960-12

4.  Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Masami Watanabe; Atsushi Nagai; Norihiro Kusumi; Hiromu Tsuboi; Yasutomo Nasu; Hiromi Kumon
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique; preliminary report.

Authors:  A PALOMO
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1949-03       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Can varicocelectomy significantly change the way couples use assisted reproductive technologies?

Authors:  Selahittin Cayan; Fikret Erdemir; Isa Ozbey; Paul J Turek; Ateş Kadioğlu; Sedat Tellaloğlu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: which technique is preferable in clinical practice?

Authors:  Paolo Gontero; Giuliano Pretti; Francesco Fontana; Andrea Zitella; Giansilvio Marchioro; Bruno Frea
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Percutaneous embolization of varicoceles: outcomes and correlation of semen improvement with pregnancy.

Authors:  G Nabi; S Asterlings; D R Greene; R L Marsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a microscopic study of the inguinal versus subinguinal approach.

Authors:  Carin V Hopps; Matthew L Lemer; Peter N Schlegel; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy in adolescents.

Authors:  Kenneth I Glassberg; Stephen A Poon; Carl K Gjertson; G Joel DeCastro; Rosalia Misseri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Varicocele Recurrence After Microscopic Sub-Inguinal Varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Alkhamees; Saeed Bin Hamri; Turki Alhumaid; Layla Alissa; Haleema Al-Lishlish; Rula Abudalo; Zafar Iqbal; Ghufran Albajhan; Ahmed Alasker
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-12-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.