Literature DB >> 11910022

Fine-tuning function: correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR.

Liskin Swint-Kruse1, Christopher Larson, B Montgomery Pettitt, Kathleen Shive Matthews.   

Abstract

LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge x hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for fine-tuning individual repressor function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11910022      PMCID: PMC2373529          DOI: 10.1110/ps.4050102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  72 in total

1.  Conformational changes of ribose-binding protein and two related repressors are tailored to fit the functional need.

Authors:  S L Mowbray; A J Björkman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-11-26       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Ion concentration and temperature dependence of DNA binding: comparison of PurR and LacI repressor proteins.

Authors:  M I Moraitis; H Xu; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Engineered disulfide linking the hinge regions within lactose repressor dimer increases operator affinity, decreases sequence selectivity, and alters allostery.

Authors:  C M Falcon; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-12-25       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator.

Authors:  C E Bell; M Lewis
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-03

5.  Operator DNA sequence variation enhances high affinity binding by hinge helix mutants of lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  C M Falcon; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 6.  Lac repressor genetic map in real space.

Authors:  H C Pace; M A Kercher; P Lu; P Markiewicz; J H Miller; G Chang; M Lewis
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 7.  Lactose repressor protein: functional properties and structure.

Authors:  K S Matthews; J C Nichols
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  1998

8.  Equilibrium binding of inducer to lac repressor.operator DNA complex.

Authors:  R B O'Gorman; J M Rosenberg; O B Kallai; R E Dickerson; K Itakura; A D Riggs; K S Matthews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-11-10       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Escherichia coli purine repressor: key residues for the allosteric transition between active and inactive conformations and for interdomain signaling.

Authors:  F Lu; R G Brennan; H Zalkin
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Structural analysis of the purine repressor, an Escherichia coli DNA-binding protein.

Authors:  M A Schumacher; J R Macdonald; J Björkman; S L Mowbray; R G Brennan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Flexibility and Disorder in Gene Regulation: LacI/GalR and Hox Proteins.

Authors:  Sarah E Bondos; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Functional consequences of exchanging domains between LacI and PurR are mediated by the intervening linker sequence.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Susan M Egan; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-07-01

4.  In vivo tests of thermodynamic models of transcription repressor function.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Harlyn Skinner; Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Dorothy Beckett
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  RheoScale: A tool to aggregate and quantify experimentally determined substitution outcomes for multiple variants at individual protein positions.

Authors:  Abby M Hodges; Aron W Fenton; Larissa L Dougherty; Andrew C Overholt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.878

6.  Functionally important positions can comprise the majority of a protein's architecture.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Daniel J Parente; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-03-04

7.  Molecular dynamics reveal the essential role of linker motions in the function of cullin-RING E3 ligases.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Allosteric transition pathways in the lactose repressor protein core domains: asymmetric motions in a homodimer.

Authors:  Terence C Flynn; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Yifei Kong; Christopher Booth; Kathleen S Matthews; Jianpeng Ma
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: bioinformatics-based predictions generate true positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.