Literature DB >> 21715082

In vivo tests of thermodynamic models of transcription repressor function.

Sudheer Tungtur1, Harlyn Skinner, Hongli Zhan, Liskin Swint-Kruse, Dorothy Beckett.   

Abstract

One emphasis of the Gibbs Conference on Biothermodynamics is the value of thermodynamic measurements for understanding behaviors of biological systems. In this study, the correlation between thermodynamic measurements of in vitro DNA binding affinity with in vivo transcription repression was investigated for two transcription repressors. In the first system, which comprised an engineered LacI/GalR homolog, mutational changes altered the equilibrium constant for binding DNA. Changes correlated with altered repression, but estimates of in vivo repressor concentration suggest a ≥25-fold discrepancy with in vitro conditions. In the second system, changes in ligand binding to BirA altered dimerization and subsequent DNA occupancy. Again, these changes correlate with altered in vivo repression, but comparison with in vitro measurements reveals a ~10-fold discrepancy. Further analysis of each system suggests that the observed discrepancies between in vitro and in vivo results reflect the contributions of additional equilibria to the transcription repression process.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21715082      PMCID: PMC3166966          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2011.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  54 in total

1.  Crowding and function reunite.

Authors:  Gary J Pielak; Andrew C Miklos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Kinetic partitioning between alternative protein-protein interactions controls a transcriptional switch.

Authors:  Huaying Zhao; Dorothy Beckett
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Germán Rivas; Allen P Minton
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.981

Review 4.  Protein folding in the cell: challenges and progress.

Authors:  Anne Gershenson; Lila M Gierasch
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 6.809

5.  Thermodynamic analysis of mutant lac repressors.

Authors:  Robert Daber; Matthew A Sochor; Mitchell Lewis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Models of macromolecular crowding effects and the need for quantitative comparisons with experiment.

Authors:  Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: bioinformatics-based predictions generate true positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-12

8.  One is not enough.

Authors:  Robert Daber; Kim Sharp; Mitchell Lewis
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Allostery in the LacI/GalR family: variations on a theme.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 7.934

10.  Subdividing repressor function: DNA binding affinity, selectivity, and allostery can be altered by amino acid substitution of nonconserved residues in a LacI/GalR homologue.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Marc Taraban; Jill Trewhella; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  14 in total

1.  Homolog comparisons further reconcile in vitro and in vivo correlations of protein activities by revealing over-looked physiological factors.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Kristen M Schwingen; Joshua J Riepe; Chamitha J Weeramange; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Conformational sampling of peptides in the presence of protein crowders from AA/CG-multiscale simulations.

Authors:  Alexander V Predeus; Seref Gul; Srinivasa M Gopal; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  RheoScale: A tool to aggregate and quantify experimentally determined substitution outcomes for multiple variants at individual protein positions.

Authors:  Abby M Hodges; Aron W Fenton; Larissa L Dougherty; Andrew C Overholt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.878

4.  Functional versatility of a single protein surface in two protein:protein interactions.

Authors:  Poorni R Adikaram; Dorothy Beckett
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 5.  Using Evolution to Guide Protein Engineering: The Devil IS in the Details.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The strengths and limitations of using biolayer interferometry to monitor equilibrium titrations of biomolecules.

Authors:  Chamitha J Weeramange; Max S Fairlamb; Dipika Singh; Aron W Fenton; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Protein:protein interactions in control of a transcriptional switch.

Authors:  Poorni R Adikaram; Dorothy Beckett
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Rheostats and toggle switches for modulating protein function.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Michael W Manley; Daniel J Parente; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Novel insights from hybrid LacI/GalR proteins: family-wide functional attributes and biologically significant variation in transcription repression.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Michael W Manley; Nicole A Becker; Jacob A Hessman; L James Maher; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Steroid receptor-DNA interactions: toward a quantitative connection between energetics and transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  David L Bain; Keith D Connaghan; Nasib K Maluf; Qin Yang; Michael T Miura; Rolando W De Angelis; Gregory D Degala; James R Lambert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.