Literature DB >> 17436321

Functional consequences of exchanging domains between LacI and PurR are mediated by the intervening linker sequence.

Sudheer Tungtur1, Susan M Egan, Liskin Swint-Kruse.   

Abstract

Homologue function can be differentiated by changing residues that affect binding sites or long-range interactions. LacI and PurR are two proteins that represent the LacI/GalR family (>500 members) of bacterial transcription regulators. All members have distinct DNA-binding and regulatory domains linked by approximately 18 amino acids. Each homologue has specificity for different DNA and regulatory effector ligands; LacI and PurR also exhibit differences in allosteric communication between DNA and effector binding sites. A comparative study of LacI and PurR suggested that alterations in the interface between the regulatory domain and linker are important for differentiating their functions. Four residues (equivalent to LacI positions 48, 55, 58, and 61) appear particularly important for creating a unique interface and were predicted to be necessary for allosteric regulation. However, nearby residues in the linker interact with DNA ligand. Thus, differences observed in interactions between linker and regulatory domain may be the cause of altered function or an effect of the two proteins binding different DNA ligands. To separate these possibilities, we created a chimeric protein with the LacI DNA-binding domain/linker and the PurR regulatory domain (LLhP). If the interface requires homologue-specific interactions in order to propagate the signal from effector binding, then LLhP repression should not be allosterically regulated by effector binding. Experiments show that LLhP is capable of repression from lacO1 and, contrary to expectation, allosteric response is intact. Further, restoring the potential for PurR-like interactions via substitutions in the LLhP linker tends to diminish repression. These effects are especially pronounced for residues 58 and 61. Clearly, binding affinity of LLhP for the lacO1 DNA site is sensitive to long-range changes in the linker. This result also raises the possibility that mutations at positions 58 and 61 co-evolved with changes in the DNA-binding site. In addition, repression measured in the absence and presence of effector ligand shows that allosteric response increases for several LLhP variants with substitutions at positions 48 and 55. Thus, while side chain variation at these sites does not generally dictate the presence or absence of allostery, the nature of the amino acid can modulate the response to effector. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17436321      PMCID: PMC2084478          DOI: 10.1002/prot.21412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  76 in total

1.  The X-ray structure of the PurR-guanine-purF operator complex reveals the contributions of complementary electrostatic surfaces and a water-mediated hydrogen bond to corepressor specificity and binding affinity.

Authors:  M A Schumacher; A Glasfeld; H Zalkin; R G Brennan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Plasticity in protein-DNA recognition: lac repressor interacts with its natural operator 01 through alternative conformations of its DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  Charalampos G Kalodimos; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Roberto K Salinas; Rainer Wechselberger; Rolf Boelens; Robert Kaptein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Transduction of lactose-utilizing ability among strains of E. coli and S. dysenteriae and the properties of the transducing phage particles.

Authors:  S E LURIA; J N ADAMS; R C TING
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1960-11       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  A closer view of the conformation of the Lac repressor bound to operator.

Authors:  C E Bell; M Lewis
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-03

5.  Extrinsic interactions dominate helical propensity in coupled binding and folding of the lactose repressor protein hinge helix.

Authors:  Hongli Zhan; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Kathleen Shive Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Role of the hydrophobic effect in stability of site-specific protein-DNA complexes.

Authors:  J H Ha; R S Spolar; M T Record
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-10-20       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  lac Repressor-operator interaction. VI. The natural inducer of the lac operon.

Authors:  A Jobe; S Bourgeois
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1972-08-28       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer.

Authors:  M Lewis; G Chang; N C Horton; M A Kercher; H C Pace; M A Schumacher; R G Brennan; P Lu
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Structural analysis of the purine repressor, an Escherichia coli DNA-binding protein.

Authors:  M A Schumacher; J R Macdonald; J Björkman; S L Mowbray; R G Brennan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Synthetic lac operator mediates repression through lac repressor when introduced upstream and downstream from lac promoter.

Authors:  M Besse; B von Wilcken-Bergmann; B Müller-Hill
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  19 in total

1.  Homolog comparisons further reconcile in vitro and in vivo correlations of protein activities by revealing over-looked physiological factors.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Kristen M Schwingen; Joshua J Riepe; Chamitha J Weeramange; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Tailor-made transcriptional biosensors for optimizing microbial cell factories.

Authors:  Brecht De Paepe; Gert Peters; Pieter Coussement; Jo Maertens; Marjan De Mey
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  RheoScale: A tool to aggregate and quantify experimentally determined substitution outcomes for multiple variants at individual protein positions.

Authors:  Abby M Hodges; Aron W Fenton; Larissa L Dougherty; Andrew C Overholt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 4.  Using Evolution to Guide Protein Engineering: The Devil IS in the Details.

Authors:  Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Engineering repressors with coevolutionary cues facilitates toggle switches with a master reset.

Authors:  Rey P Dimas; Xian-Li Jiang; Jose Alberto de la Paz; Faruck Morcos; Clement T Y Chan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Functionally important positions can comprise the majority of a protein's architecture.

Authors:  Sudheer Tungtur; Daniel J Parente; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-03-04

7.  Molecular dynamics reveal the essential role of linker motions in the function of cullin-RING E3 ligases.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Biomolecular Assemblies: Moving from Observation to Predictive Design.

Authors:  Corey J Wilson; Andreas S Bommarius; Julie A Champion; Yury O Chernoff; David G Lynn; Anant K Paravastu; Chen Liang; Ming-Chien Hsieh; Jennifer M Heemstra
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Ligand-induced conformational changes and conformational dynamics in the solution structure of the lactose repressor protein.

Authors:  Marc Taraban; Hongli Zhan; Andrew E Whitten; David B Langley; Kathleen S Matthews; Liskin Swint-Kruse; Jill Trewhella
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Experimental identification of specificity determinants in the domain linker of a LacI/GalR protein: bioinformatics-based predictions generate true positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Sarah Meinhardt; Liskin Swint-Kruse
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.